BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                       


           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                  SB 1488|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 445-6614         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                              UNFINISHED BUSINESS


          Bill No:  SB 1488
          Author:   Bowen (D)
          Amended:  6/9/04
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE ENERGY, U.&C. COMMITTEE  :  5-1, 3/23/04
          AYES:  Bowen, Alarcon, Dunn, Sher, Vasconcellos
          NOES:  Battin
          NO VOTE RECORDED: Morrow,  McClintock, Murray

           SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE  :  4-2, 4/20/04
          AYES:  Escutia, Cedillo, Kuehl, Sher
          NOES:  Morrow, Ackerman
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Ducheny

          SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  Senate Rule 28.8

           SENATE FLOOR  :  22-10, 8/27/04
          AYES:  Alarcon, Alpert, Bowen, Burton, Chesbro, Dunn,  
            Escutia, Figueroa, Hollingsworth, Karnette, Kuehl,  
            Machado, McClintock, Murray, Ortiz, Perata, Romero,  
            Scott, Sher, Speier, Torlakson, Vasconcellos
          NOES:  Ackerman, Ashburn, Battin, Brulte, Denham, Margett,  
            McPherson, Morrow, Oller, Poochigian
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Aanestad, Cedillo, Ducheny, Florez,  
            Johnson, Soto, Vincent, Vacancy

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  75-3, 8/27/04 - See last page for vote


           SUBJECT  :    Public Utilities Commission: public information

           SOURCE  :     Author
                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               SB 1488
                                                                Page  
          2



           DIGEST  :    This bill requires the State Public Utilities  
          Commission (PUC) to initiate a proceeding to review its  
          public disclosure practices.

           Assembly Amendments  delete the prior version, however, the  
          subject and intent remain the same.  As it left the Senate,  
          the bill subjected all information to public inspection,  
          unless already exempt by state law or unless the PUC  
          determines that the public interest would be better served  
          by withholding disclosure.

           ANALYSIS  :    Unlike other state agencies, whose records are  
          generally open for public inspection, the PUC operates  
          under a statute that affords the public access to its  
          records only when specifically permitted by the PUC. 

          The section creating the presumption against public  
          inspection has its origin in a law enacted in 1915.   
          Despite the "open government" reforms in California such as  
          the Public Records Act (PRA), enacted in 1968, the  
          statutory standard for public access to utility filings  
          with the PUC has not fundamentally changed since 1915.

          The PRA gives every person the right to inspect and obtain  
          copies of all state and local government documents not  
          exempt from disclosure.   Exemptions include corporate  
          financial records and corporate proprietary information,  
          including trade secrets.  The PRA also specifically  
          provides that information held by the PUC which is deemed  
          confidential under Section 583 of the Public Utilities Code  
          is not required to be disclosed. 

          In January 2004, the Legislature adopted SCA 1 (Burton),  
          which proposes to make access to records and public  
          meetings of government officials and agencies a  
          constitutional right of each citizen.  To be enacted, SCA 1  
          also must be approved by voters and is pending on the  
          November 2004 statewide ballot.  If enacted, SCA 1 would  
          not repeal or nullify Section 583 or any other existing law  
          that creates an exception to the right of access to public  
          records.
           







                                                              SB 1488
                                                                Page  
          3

           Existing law requires public utilities to furnish to the  
          PUC information necessary for the PUC to carry out its  
          regulatory duties. 

          Existing law requires that records of every state agency be  
          made available for public inspection upon request, with  
          certain exceptions and subject to procedures. 

          Existing law establishes a presumption against public  
          disclosure by providing that no information furnished by a  
          public utility, or its subsidiary, affiliate or holding  
          company, shall be made public unless a provision of the  
          Public Utilities Act or the PUC requires it to be made  
          public. 

          This bill requires the PUC to initiate a proceeding to  
          review its public disclosure practices.  Specifically, this  
          bill requires PUC to initiate a proceeding to review its  
          practices under its electricity procurement proceeding and  
          it public disclosure rules to ensure meaningful public  
          participation and open decision making. 

           Comments  .  The purpose of this bill is to require the PUC  
          to initiate a proceeding to review its information  
          disclosure practices to ensure meaningful public  
          participation and open decision making.  This comes as a  
          result of an increase amount of information being redacted  
          by the PUC before disclosure to the public.  Currently the  
          PUC has initiated a process to review the public disclosure  
          process for information in the long-term electricity  
          procurement proceeding where numerous parties involved  
          representing both ratepayers and competitors want greater  
          disclosure for different reasons.  Since decisions made by  
          the PUC can affect market decisions a more thorough review  
          of the public disclosure practices of the agency would go a  
          long way towards ensuring that the public and interested  
          parties see  process as fair and open. 

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    
          Local:  No

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  5/25/04) (Unable to re-verify at time  
          of this writing)








                                                               SB 1488
                                                                Page  
          4

          American Federation of State, County and Municipal  
          Employees, AFL-CIO
          Clean Power Campaign
          Environment California
          Independent Energy Producers
          Sierra Club

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :
          AYES:  Aghazarian, Bates, Benoit, Berg, Bermudez, Bogh,  
            Calderon, Campbell, Canciamilla, Chan, Chavez, Chu,  
            Cogdill, Cohn, Corbett, Correa, Cox, Daucher, Diaz,  
            Dutra, Dutton, Dymally, Firebaugh, Frommer, Garcia,  
            Goldberg, Hancock, Jerome Horton, Shirley Horton,  
            Jackson, Keene, Kehoe, Koretz, La Malfa, La Suer, Laird,  
            Leno, Leslie, Levine, Lieber, Liu, Longville, Lowenthal,  
            Maddox, Maldonado, Matthews, Maze, McCarthy, Montanez,  
            Mountjoy, Mullin, Nakanishi, Nakano, Nation, Negrete  
            McLeod, Oropeza, Pacheco, Parra, Pavley, Reyes, Richman,  
            Ridley-Thomas, Salinas, Samuelian, Simitian, Spitzer,  
            Steinberg, Strickland, Vargas, Wesson, Wiggins, Wolk,  
            Wyland, Yee, Nunez
          NOES: Haynes,  Plescia, Runner
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Harman, Houston


          NC:mel  8/31/04   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****