BILL ANALYSIS
SB 1488
Page 1
Date of Hearing: August 4, 2004
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Judy Chu, Chair
SB 1488 (Bowen) - As Amended: June 9, 2004
Policy Committee:
UtilitiesVote:10-1
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program:
No Reimbursable:
SUMMARY
This bill requires the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) to
initiate a proceeding to review its public disclosure
practices--both in general and specifically with regard to
information submitted to the commission in the investor-owned
utilities' electricity procurement plans--to ensure meaningful
public participation and open decision making.
FISCAL EFFECT
One-time special fund costs (Public Utilities Reimbursement
Account) of up to $100,000 for the PUC to review its general
practices regarding public disclosure. (The PUC is currently
reviewing its treatment of confidential information within the
scope of an electricity procurement proceeding. The results of
that review would, only in part, be able to applied to a general
examination of the commission's disclosure policies.)
COMMENTS
Purpose . According to the author, this bill is the result of an
increased amount of information being redacted by the PUC before
disclosure to the public. Unlike other state agencies, the PUC
operates under a 1915 statute (Section 583 of the Public
Utilities Code) which makes public access to much of the
information in its proceedings the exception, rather than the
rule. The statute was enacted long before subsequent "open
government" reforms, such as the California Public Records Act
(PRA) of 1968. Under the PRA, every person has a right to
inspect and obtain copies of all state and local government
documents and records not exempt from disclosure. Among the
SB 1488
Page 2
categories of records exempt from disclosure are corporate
financial records and proprietary information, including trade
secrets. The PRA also specifically provides that information
held by the PUC which is deemed confidential under Section 583
is not required to be disclosed.
The PUC has initiated a process to review the public disclosure
process for information in the long-term electricity procurement
proceeding, where numerous parties involved representing both
ratepayers and competitors want greater disclosure for different
reasons. The author believes that, in addition to disclosure
within this specific proceeding, the PUC should also revisit its
public disclosure practices in general and with regard to the
intent of the PRA.
Analysis Prepared by : Chuck Nicol / APPR. / (916) 319-2081