BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  SB 1488
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:  June 14, 2004

                    ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON UTILITIES AND COMMERCE
                                 Sarah Reyes, Chair
                     SB 1488 (Bowen) - As Amended:  June 9, 2004

           SENATE VOTE  :  Not relevant.
           
          SUBJECT  :  Public Utilities Commission:  public information.

           SUMMARY  :  Requires the California Public Utilities Commission  
          (CPUC) to initiate a proceeding to review its public disclosure  
          practices.  Specifically,  this bill  requires CPUC to initiate a  
          proceeding to review its practices under its electricity  
          procurement proceeding and it public disclosure rules to ensure  
          meaningful public participation and open decision making.

           EXISTING LAW  the California Constitution (Article 1, Section 3)  
          provides that the people have the right to instruct their  
          representatives, petition government for redress of grievances,  
          and assemble freely to consult for the common good.

          The following state laws regulate the public's access to  
          government information: 

          1)The California Public Records Act (PRA) establishes the right  
            of every person to inspect and obtain copies of all state and  
            local government documents and records not exempt from  
            disclosure.  PRA requires specified state and local agencies  
            to establish written guidelines for accessibility of records,  
            to post these guidelines at their offices, and to make them  
            available free of charge to any person requesting that  
            agency's records. 

          2)The Ralph M. Brown Act (Brown Act) which governs meetings of  
            legislative bodies of local agencies (e.g. boards of  
            supervisors, city councils, school boards) is virtually  
            identical to the Bagley-Keene Act and requires local  
            legislative bodies to hold meetings in open forum after public  
            notice of agenda items.  The Brown Act also recognizes the  
            need, under limited circumstances, for these bodies to meet in  
            private in order to carry out their responsibilities in the  
            best interests of the public and provides for specified  
            exceptions.  Both acts (Brown Act & Bagley-Keene) provide that  
            the covered entities "exist to aid in the conduct of the  








                                                                  SB 1488
                                                                  Page  2

            people's business" and that their actions "be taken openly and  
            that their deliberations be conducted openly."

          3)The Bagley-Keene Open Meeting Act (Bagley-Keene) requires all  
            meetings of a state body to be open and public and grants the  
            right to attend such meetings to all persons, with certain  
            exceptions.  The Bagley-Keene requires these public meetings  
            to be noticed with an agenda that contains the items of  
            business that may be acted upon at the meeting.  The  
            Bagley-Keene defines a state body to mean every state board,  
            commission, or similar multimember body of the state that is  
            created by statute or required by law to conduct official  
            meetings and every commission created by executive order.  In  
            addition, the Bagley-Keene excludes from that definition  
            certain bodies of the Judiciary and Legislature, among other  
            things.

          4)The Legislative Open Records Act (LORA) provides that the  
            public may inspect legislative records, as defined, and  
            mandates that committee and floor analyses records be  
            permanently preserved either in the appropriate committee  
            office or with the State Archives.  LORA declares that "access  
            to information concerning the conduct of the people's business  
            by the Legislature is a fundamental and necessary right of  
            every citizen in this state."  The LORA provides for  
            "nondisclosure" of certain records, including, (1) records  
            pertaining to pending litigation; (2) preliminary drafts,  
            notes, or legislative memoranda, except as specified; (3)  
            personnel, medical, or similar files; (4) communications from  
            private citizens; (5) records in the custody of or maintained  
            by the Legislative Counsel; (6) correspondence of and to  
            individual Legislators and their staff; (7) records of  
            complaints to or investigations conducted by, or records of  
            security procedures of, the Legislature; and, (8) records  
            maintained by the majority and minority caucuses.

          5)The Grunsky-Burton Open Meeting Act (Grunsky-Burton) provides  
            that meetings of a house of the Legislature or a committee  
            shall be open and public and all persons shall be permitted to  
            attend the meetings.  The Grunsky-Burton permits the  
            Legislature or a committee thereof to hold closed meetings  
            solely for any of the following purposes: (1) to consider  
            certain personnel matters; (2) to consider matters affecting  
            safety and security; (3) to confer with legal counsel  
            regarding any litigation matter; and, (4) a caucus of the  








                                                                  SB 1488
                                                                  Page  3

            Members of the Senate, the Members of the Assembly, or the  
            Members of both houses.

          6)Establishes a separate statute governing information  
            disclosure within the Public Utilities Code.  The statute  
            states that no information furnished to CPUC by a public  
            utility or its affiliates shall be open to public inspection  
            or made public except on order of CPUC.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  Unknown.

           COMMENTS  :

           Purpose of this bill  is to require CPUC to initiate a proceeding  
          to review its information disclosure practices to ensure  
          meaningful public participation and open decision making.  This  
          comes as a result of an increase amount of information being  
          redacted by CPUC before disclosure to the public.  Currently  
          CPUC has initiated a process to review the public disclosure  
          process for information in the long-term electricity procurement  
          proceeding where numerous parties involved representing both  
          ratepayers and competitors want greater disclosure for different  
          reasons.  The committee should note that in order to foster  
          greater access to information deemed sensitive and proprietary  
          CPUC has developed Procurement Review Groups (PRG) of which  
          ratepayers sit as representatives to review all documents  
          relating to an investor owned utilities procurement decisions  
          that are not disclosed to the public.

          Still, since the decisions made by CPUC can affect market  
          decisions a more thorough review of the public disclosure  
          practices of the agency would go a long way towards ensuring  
          that the public and interested parties see process as fair and  
          open.

           REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :

           Support 
           
          Not relevant
           
            Opposition 
           
          Not relevant









                                                                  SB 1488
                                                                  Page  4

           Analysis Prepared by  :    Daniel Kim / U. & C. / (916) 319-2083