BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  SB 1478
                                                                  Page  1

          SENATE THIRD READING
          SB 1478 (Sher)
          As Amended August 26, 2004
          Majority vote

           SENATE VOTE  :26-8  
           
           UTILITIES AND COMMERCE          NATURAL RESOURCES               
                         (vote not relevant)           (vote not relevant)

           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |     |                          |     |                          |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
          |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
          |     |                          |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           
          APPROPRIATIONS                  UTILITIES AND COMMERCE     7-3  
                          (vote not relevant)

           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |     |                          |Ayes:|Reyes, Campbell,          |
          |     |                          |     |Calderon,, Diaz, Levine,  |
          |     |                          |     |Ridley-Thomas, Wesson     |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
          |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
          |     |                          |Nays:|Bogh, Canciamilla, La     |
          |     |                          |     |Malfa                     |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 

           SUMMARY  :  Makes numerous changes to the Renewable Portfolio  
          Standards Program (RPS) and the Renewable Energy Program (REP).   
          Specifically,  this bill  :

          1)Advances the deadline for achieving a 20% renewable portfolio  
            from 2017 to 2010. 

          2)Provides that a renewable energy project may only receive an  
            award of Supplement Energy Payments (SEP) if the project is  
            selected by an investor owned utility (IOU) pursuant to a  
            competitive solicitation or by other retail electricity  
            providers through a solicitation process approved by  
            California Public Utilities Commission (PUC). 









                                                                  SB 1478
                                                                  Page  2

          3)Provides that electricity generation from hydroelectric  
            facilities of 30 megawatts or less shall count toward a retail  
            seller's renewable portfolio only if the retail seller  
            procured power from that source prior to December 31, 2003.

          4)Repeals the requirement that the California Energy Commission  
            (CEC) direct 10% ($13.5 million/year) of renewable funds  
            collected via the Public Goods Charge (PGC) for credits to  
            existing renewable direct access customers (CEC has suspended  
            the customer credit program and redirected the funds to other  
            renewable programs).

          5)Allows a renewable energy facility to qualify for SEPs based  
            on the total length of the contract instead of limiting the  
            payment to the value of the contract over the first ten years.

          6)Authorizes a renewable energy credit (REC) trading program to  
            allow the sale of the renewable attribute of renewable  
            electricity as a commodity unbundled from the physical  
            production and delivery of renewable electricity. 

          7)Provides that CEC may not award SEPs for the sale or purchase  
            or RECs.

          8)Provides that a contract for the purchase of electricity  
            generated by an eligible renewable resource shall include REC  
            associated with all electricity generation specified in the  
            contract. 

          9)Provides that there are no RECs associated with renewable  
            power generated under terms of a contract executed before  
            January 1, 2005, that did not contain explicit terms  
            specifying ownership of energy credits.

          10)Provides that there are no RECs associated with contracts  
            awarded to Qualifying Facilities (QFs) under the Public  
            Utility Regulatory Policies Act (PURPA) of 1978, but  
            deliveries under these contracts shall count toward RPS  
            obligations.

          11)Provides that no REC shall be eligible to count toward RPS if  
            it has been sold more than once separately from the associated  
            electricity. 

          12)Prohibits an electrical corporation from selling RECs  








                                                                  SB 1478
                                                                  Page  3

            associated with electricity included in the electrical  
            corporations baseline quantity on January 1, 2004.

          13)Prohibits an electrical corporation from selling RECs in any  
            year in which it has procured inadequate renewable resources.

          14)Allows an IOU serving less than 60,000 customers in  
            California that also serves customers in another state (i.e.,  
            PacifiCorp and Sierra Pacific Power) to count out of state  
            renewable resources toward its RPS compliance.

          15)Requires electrical corporations and municipal utilities to  
            adopt strategies in their long term procurement plans to  
            achieve efficiency in the use of fossil fuels and to address  
            carbon emissions.

           EXISTING LAW : 

          1)Creates RPS which requires IOUs and certain other retail  
            sellers to meet to increase renewable electricity procurement  
            by 1% of sales per year until a 20% renewable resources  
            portfolio is reached, but sets a deadline of 2017 for  
            achieving a 20% renewable portfolio.  Municipal utilities are  
            exempt from the statutory requirements of RPS and instead  
            required to implement and enforce their own RPS programs.

          2)Defines renewable electricity to include electricity from a  
            facility that uses biomass, solar thermal, photovoltaic, wind,  
            geothermal, fuel cells using renewable fuels, small  
            hydroelectric generation of 30 megawatts or less, digester  
            gas, municipal solid waste conversion, landfill gas, ocean  
            wave, ocean thermal, or, tidal current.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  Unknown

           COMMENTS  :  In 2002, the Legislature passed SB 1078, Chapter 516;  
          SB 1038, Chapter 515; and AB 57, Chapter 835.  These bills taken  
          together created a RPS in California.  Under RPS, IOUs are  
          required to increase their renewable procurement each year by at  
          least 1% of total sales, so that 20% of their sales are from  
          renewable energy sources by December 31, 2017.  Once a 20%  
          portfolio is achieved, no further increase is required.  CPUC is  
          required to adopt comparable requirements for direct access  
          providers and community choice aggregators. 









                                                                  SB 1478
                                                                  Page  4

          RPS also allows new renewable energy providers to apply to CEC  
          for SEP.  SEPs will be awarded to renewable energy providers to  
          cover the difference between the prices they bid in a  
          competitive solicitation and a market price established by CPUC.  
           RPS requires IOUs, and certain other retail energy providers,  
          to buy renewable electricity to the extent PGC funds are  
          available to pay for SEP.  If no PGC funds are available, the  
          retail energy providers are not required to purchase additional  
          renewable power.
           
          Accelerated RPS Compliance:   The "Energy Action Plan" adopted by  
          CPUC, CEC and the Power Authority (PA) pledges that the agencies  
          will accelerate RPS implementation to meet the 20% goal by 2010,  
          instead of 2017.  The Governor has also endorsed "20% by 2010"  
          and proposed an additional goal of 33% by 2020. 

          Currently, two of the three major IOUs appear to be able to meet  
          the 20% by 2010 goal.  Pacific Gas & Electric's (PG&E) current  
          baseline of renewable power is at 12%, while Southern California  
          Edison (SCE) already has 17% of eligible renewable power in its  
          portfolio.  However, San Diego Gas & Electric (SDG&E) currently  
          only receives 1.8% of its electricity from renewable resources. 

          Due to SDG&E's miniscule renewable electricity baseline and  
          transmission constraints that will limit its ability to procure  
          new renewable power from outside its service territory, SDG&E  
          believes they will not be able to meet a 20% by 2010 goal  
          without the addition of a REC program. 
           
           Renewable Energy Credits:  REC program established in this bill  
          may help IOUs and other retail electric providers meet the  
          accelerated RPS goals by allowing them to purchase the  
          attributes of renewable power without having to purchase  
          unneeded or undeliverable generation.  A REC program will allow  
          the environmental attributes of renewable energy to be unbundled  
          from the energy itself and allow the energy and the attributes  
          to be trade as separate commodities.  A REC program would allow  
          SDG&E to purchase RECs from a wind farm in Northern California  
          while the wind farm sells its electricity output to another  
          retail electricity provider that does not need the environmental  
          attributes.  SDG&E would not need to rely on congested  
          transmission lines for delivery of the actual electricity and  
          instead could produce the needed energy from non-renewable  
          sources within its service territory.  Alternatively, a small  
          retail seller, such as an energy service provider (ESP), who may  








                                                                  SB 1478
                                                                  Page  5

          not be able to sign the long-term contracts necessary to develop  
          new renewable resources, can buy RECs instead. 

          Since SB 1478 contains explicate provisions against double  
          counting of RECs, the same amount of new renewable power would  
          need to be built to meet RPS as would be needed without a REC  
          program.  However, REC program will allow the retail providers  
          to more efficiently meet their renewable obligations.  

          Similar trading programs are already in place in Texas and  
          Massachusetts.  Additionally, programs have been in place for  
          some time that allow for the trading of the environmental  
          benefits of reduced SO2 and NOx emissions. 

          While SB 1478 leaves much of the task of developing a REC  
          program to CEC and CPUC, this bill establishes a narrow  
          definition of RECs and further limits how RECs can be traded.   
          The limits are an effort to prevent a wide open REC market,  
          which might undermine RPS goal of promoting investment in new  
          renewable resources in California and could create the potential  
          for market gaming.

          Even with these limitations, opponents of this bill are  
          concerned that a poorly structured REC program will be a target  
          for market manipulation. 

          Carbon emissions:  Amendments taken in policy committee on  
          August 25, 2004, add a new section to this bill that will  
          require electrical corporations and municipal utilities to adopt  
          strategies in their long term procurement plans to achieve  
          efficiency in the use of fossil fuels and to address carbon  
          emissions.


           Analysis Prepared by  :    Edward Randolph / U. & C. / (916)  
          319-2083 



                                                               FN: 0008959