BILL ANALYSIS
SB 920
Page 1
Date of Hearing: July 16, 2003
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Darrell Steinberg, Chair
SB 920 (Bowen) - As Amended: July 3, 2003
Policy Committee:
UtilitiesVote:10-1
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program:
Yes Reimbursable: No
SUMMARY
This bill eliminates the Electricity Oversight Board (EOB),
transfers the EOB's legal and regulatory proceedings to the
Attorney General (AG), and makes related changes regarding the
Independent System Operator (ISO) and the Power Exchange (PX).
Specifically, this bill:
1)Repeals provisions of law establishing and granting powers to
the EOB, which includes oversight of ISO.
2)Declares that any reference in code to the EOB is deemed to
refer to the AG and, in order to preserve the state's interest
in all legal or regulatory proceeding where the EOB is a
party, vests with the AG all duties and powers of the EOB.
3)Requires the governor to designate a successor for the EOB's
duties related to monitoring and investigation of wholesale
electricity markets.
4)Requires the corporate powers of the ISO, under the
Corporations Code, to be exercised only by a governing board
appointed by the governor and confirmed by the Senate.
5)Requires ISO to receive approval from the Legislature before
entering into a multi-state entity or a regional organization.
FISCAL EFFECT
No net fiscal impact assuming costs and budgets for supporting
the duties of the EOB would shift to the AG and to the EOB's
SB 920
Page 2
designated successor for monitoring and investigation of
wholesale electricity markets. (The governor's proposed 2003-04
budget for the EOB totaled $3.7 million and 26 positions.)
COMMENTS
Background and Purpose . The EOB was established by AB 1890 to
oversee the ISO and the PX-specifically to confirm ISO and PX
board members and to hear appeals of those boards' decisions.
These functions were negated by the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission's (FERC's) assertion of exclusive jurisdiction over
the ISO and PX. SB 96 (Peace)-Chapter 510/Statutes of 1996
attempted a compromise with FERC by in part limiting the EOB's
confirmation powers to the appointments of customer
representative to the ISO board, but this was later abandoned by
the FERC. With the subsequent demise of the PX, the passage of
AB 5X (Keeley)-Chapter 1/Statutes of 2001, which established an
ISO board appointed by the Governor, and SB 47 (Bowen)-Chapter
766/Statutes of 2001, which required Senate, rather than EOB
confirmation of ISO board members, the powers of the EOB have
been substantially diminished. According to the author, EOB
staff still represent the state in FERC proceedings, but they
report directly to the Governor's Office. In the past few
years, the board itself has met very few times and has provided
very little policy guidance or taken significant formal actions.
Analysis Prepared by : Chuck Nicol / APPR. / (916) 319-2081