BILL ANALYSIS SB 920 Page 1 Date of Hearing: July 16, 2003 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS Darrell Steinberg, Chair SB 920 (Bowen) - As Amended: July 3, 2003 Policy Committee: UtilitiesVote:10-1 Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program: Yes Reimbursable: No SUMMARY This bill eliminates the Electricity Oversight Board (EOB), transfers the EOB's legal and regulatory proceedings to the Attorney General (AG), and makes related changes regarding the Independent System Operator (ISO) and the Power Exchange (PX). Specifically, this bill: 1)Repeals provisions of law establishing and granting powers to the EOB, which includes oversight of ISO. 2)Declares that any reference in code to the EOB is deemed to refer to the AG and, in order to preserve the state's interest in all legal or regulatory proceeding where the EOB is a party, vests with the AG all duties and powers of the EOB. 3)Requires the governor to designate a successor for the EOB's duties related to monitoring and investigation of wholesale electricity markets. 4)Requires the corporate powers of the ISO, under the Corporations Code, to be exercised only by a governing board appointed by the governor and confirmed by the Senate. 5)Requires ISO to receive approval from the Legislature before entering into a multi-state entity or a regional organization. FISCAL EFFECT No net fiscal impact assuming costs and budgets for supporting the duties of the EOB would shift to the AG and to the EOB's SB 920 Page 2 designated successor for monitoring and investigation of wholesale electricity markets. (The governor's proposed 2003-04 budget for the EOB totaled $3.7 million and 26 positions.) COMMENTS Background and Purpose . The EOB was established by AB 1890 to oversee the ISO and the PX-specifically to confirm ISO and PX board members and to hear appeals of those boards' decisions. These functions were negated by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (FERC's) assertion of exclusive jurisdiction over the ISO and PX. SB 96 (Peace)-Chapter 510/Statutes of 1996 attempted a compromise with FERC by in part limiting the EOB's confirmation powers to the appointments of customer representative to the ISO board, but this was later abandoned by the FERC. With the subsequent demise of the PX, the passage of AB 5X (Keeley)-Chapter 1/Statutes of 2001, which established an ISO board appointed by the Governor, and SB 47 (Bowen)-Chapter 766/Statutes of 2001, which required Senate, rather than EOB confirmation of ISO board members, the powers of the EOB have been substantially diminished. According to the author, EOB staff still represent the state in FERC proceedings, but they report directly to the Governor's Office. In the past few years, the board itself has met very few times and has provided very little policy guidance or taken significant formal actions. Analysis Prepared by : Chuck Nicol / APPR. / (916) 319-2081