BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                       


           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                   SB 834|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 445-6614         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                                 THIRD READING


          Bill No:  SB 834
          Author:   Bowen (D)
          Amended:  4/10/03
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE ENERGY, U.&C. COMMITTEE  :  6-0, 4/22/03
          AYES:  Bowen, Alarcon, Dunn, McClintock, Murray, Sher

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  Senate Rule 28.8


           SUBJECT  :    Public utilities:  high speed communications  
          services

           SOURCE  :     Author


           DIGEST  :    This bill requires the Public Utilities  
          Commission to convene a proceeding to consider how to  
          encourage more competition in the high speed communications  
          services business.

           ANALYSIS  :    Current law declares it is the policy of the  
          state of California to:  (a) Encourage the ubiquitous  
          availability of a wide choice of state-of-the-art services;  
          and (b) Promote economic growth by encouraging the rapid  
          implementation of advanced communications technologies.

          This bill requires the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) to  
          consider how to encourage more competition in the  
          high-speed communications services industry and make  
          appropriate recommendations to the Legislature by July 1,  
          2004.
                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                SB 834
                                                                Page  
          2


           Background
           
          The late 1990's saw a burst of competitive activity in the  
          telecommunications industry as the federal  
          Telecommunications Act of 1996 opened the door to new  
          competitors.  From about a dozen competitors in 1996 to  
          over 150 in 1998 to nearly 500 in 1999, new competitors  
          installed thousands of miles of fiber optic line and  
          created many new services, such as digital subscriber line  
          (DSL).

          At the turn of the century, the "dot com" boom went bust,  
          triggering a swift and drastic reduction in the need for  
          telecommunications capacity.  Once promising  
          telecommunications companies perished as their markets  
          vanished, as did their access to capital.  Making matters  
          worse were the high profile examples of corporate  
          misconduct, where some telecommunications competitors  
          participated in questionable, and some times fraudulent,  
          accounting practices.   By 2001, the 500 telecommunications  
          competitors had dwindled to less than 100.

          In some areas of the state, such as parts of San Diego and  
          Orange counties, there is relatively vigorous competition  
          on the high speed communications service front.  However,  
          it's just as common for customers to either have no choice  
          between DSL and cable broadband or no broadband service  
          available at all.  The PUC noted in its 2002 Competition  
          Report that 24 percent of cities have no broadband service,  
          34 percent have only DSL service, 18 percent have only  
          cable broadband service, and just 24 percent have a choice  
          between DSL and cable service.  Looking more closely within  
          those two services, there is little competition among DSL  
          providers and among cable providers.  The vast majority of  
          residential DSL service is provided by the incumbent local  
          telephone company (i.e., SBC and Verizon) and its  
          affiliates, with 97 percent of residential broadband  
          revenue going to the incumbent and its affiliate.  Business  
          DSL service is much more competitive, with 59 percent of  
          business DSL revenue going to the incumbent and its  
          affiliate.

          The availability of a widespread broadband infrastructure  







                                                                SB 834
                                                                Page  
          3

          has long been seen as a key to the next stage of growth of  
          the California economy.  In Connecting to Compete in the  
          New Economy, a report prepared for the Great Valley Center,  
          the authors note technology has the potential to transform  
          the Central Valley.  They see advanced an communications  
          infrastructure as the key technology to the area being able  
          to exploit its natural strengths in agriculture,  
          specialized manufacturing, warehousing, and distribution.   
          TechNet, the lobbying arm for the high tech industry, has  
          issued a call for a national broadband policy as a means of  
          staying competitive, educating the workforce, and  
          increasing productivity.

           Comments

           Getting The Services.  Current law is designed to encourage  
          a wide choice of state-of-the-art telecommunications  
          services, but as noted in the "Background" section and  
          during an informational hearing the Senate Energy,  
          Utilities and Communications Committee held last year,  
          competition is more of a theory than a reality in most  
          parts of the state.

          This isn't to say there are no innovations on the horizon.   
          Wireless broadband service has started to become  
          commercially available and improved network technology may  
          improve data transmission capacity over existing  
          telecommunications networks.  The notion of delivering  
          broadband services over electric power lines looks  
          promising, though it's in the very early stages of  
          development.  

          This bill requires the PUC to look at and develop ways it  
          can encourage more competition in the high speed  
          communications services business. 

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    
          Local:  No


          NC:nl  5/5/03   Senate Floor Analyses 

                       SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  NONE RECEIVED








                                                                SB 834
                                                                Page  
          4

                                ****  END  ****