BILL ANALYSIS SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE Martha M. Escutia, Chair 2003-2004 Regular Session SB 772 S Senator Bowen B As Introduced Hearing Date: April 22, 2003 7 Public Resources Code 7 GMO:rm 2 SUBJECT State ERCDC Reports: Confidentiality and Disclosure DESCRIPTION This bill would establish the test to be used by the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission (ERCDC) in granting a written request for disaggregated or unmasked records of confidential information it has received or developed. BACKGROUND SB 1389 (Bowen, Chapter 568, Statutes of 2002) repealed the planning and forecasting provisions of the Warren-Alquist State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Act and enacted a new mandate for the ERCDC to prepare an integrated energy policy report, based on data to be collected and information to be developed by the commission. As heard and approved by the Senate, SB 1389 contained specific provisions for the handling of requests for records of information submitted to the ERCDC for the purpose of preparing the Integrated Energy Policy Report. This bill also contained language comporting its provisions with the requirements, intent and interpretation of the Public Records Act (PRA), which generally applies to records of all public agencies. This language was deleted from SB 1389 in the Assembly, and the enrolled form of the bill. (more) SB 772 (Bowen) Page 2 SB 772 would reinsert this language into Public Resources Code (P.R.C.) Section 25322. CHANGES TO EXISTING LAW Existing law permits persons submitting information to the state ERCDC for the purpose of developing the Integrated Energy Policy Report to request that specific information be held in confidence, and requires the ERCDC to grant the request under specified circumstances. Existing law deems confidential information presented to or developed by the ERCDC as required by law. Existing law requires the ERCDC to aggregate or mask confidential information to the extent necessary to assure confidentiality if public disclosure of the specific information would result in unfair competitive disadvantage to the person supplying the information. Existing law provides the procedure for handling requests for records of information collected or developed by the ERCDC. With respect to a request to disclose a disaggregated or unmasked record of information designated as confidential by the ERCDC, existing law requires the ERCDC to deny the request if the disclosure will result in an unfair competitive disadvantage to the person that submitted the information. This bill , with respect to a request to disclose a disaggregated or unmasked record of information designated as confidential by the ERCDC, would require the commission to grant the request if the disclosure would not result in unfair competitive disadvantage to the person that submitted the information, unless the public interest served by nondisclosure clearly outweighs the public interest served by disclosure, or unless another applicable provision of law exempts the information from disclosure. COMMENT 1. Need for the bill SB 772 (Bowen) Page 3 The author states that even though she agreed to delete this provision from SB 1389 when that bill was heard in the Assembly Utilities and Commerce Committee, she believes that it "strikes the proper balance between the private interest in maintaining the confidentiality of sensitive commercial information and the public interest in understanding the functioning of energy markets and institutions which serve as the basis for important public decisions." 2. The Public Records Act compared to P.R.C. Sec. 25322: the balancing test The Public Records Act requires public agencies, upon request by any person, to make available for inspection or copying records it maintains. [Gov. Code Sec. 6250 et seq.] The basic principle underlying the PRA is that all records kept by a public agency are disclosable unless exempt from disclosure. Thus, the PRA provides a long list of records that are exempt from disclosure (such as personnel and medical records, which are confidential and require a court order or a request to be made by the person entitled to the record), and establishes a process for the court to review the denial of a request for public records. When a request for inspection or copying of a public record is denied, it is usually because the record is specifically exempt from disclosure. Where a record is not exempt, but the agency denies the request, the person requesting the record may petition the court for an order requiring disclosure. The court, in that case, weighs the public interest served in having the record disclosed against the public interest served by not disclosing the record and denies the request if the public interest served by not having the record disclosed clearly outweighs the public interest served by disclosure. Public Resources Code Section 25322 provides the manner by which the ERCDC must handle requests for records of information submitted to it by various business interests that deal with energy resources. Some of the information submitted may be confidential, and some not. Section 25322 provides a means for the submitting party to request that the information provided to the commission SB 772 (Bowen) Page 4 be held in confidence, and the commission is required to grant the request under one of three circumstances: (1) the information is confidentiality exempt from the Public Records Act; (2) the information is confidential (proprietary) under specified regulations; or (3) on the facts of the case the public interest served by not disclosing the information clearly outweighs the public interest served by disclosure. Sec. 25322 also authorizes the commission to designate, by regulation, certain categories of information as confidential, thus removing the necessity for a submitting party to request confidentiality for certain information. Lastly, all information held in confidence by the commission is aggregated or masked to the extent necessary to assure confidentiality if public disclosure of the specific information would result in an unfair competitive disadvantage to the party that submitted the information. SB 772 deals with a written request for disaggregated or unmasked record of information deemed confidential by the commission at the request of the submitting party, or because it falls within a category designated confidential by regulation. Current law [P.R.C. 25322(b)(2)] requires that when the commission receives a written request for this record, notice of the request shall be provided to the party that submitted the information. Within five working days of the receipt of the notice, the submitting party must provide written justification of the claim of confidentiality. Within 20 working days of its receipt of the written request, the commission is required to issue its ruling. Under current law, the commission must deny the request if the disclosure would result in an unfair competitive disadvantage to the party that submitted the information. If it grants the request, it must withhold disclosure for up to 14 working days to allow the submitting party to seek judicial review of the commission's decision to grant the request. The law does not provide a standard for the commission to use in determining when a request may be granted. SB 772 provides that standard of review, following as closely as SB 772 (Bowen) Page 5 possible the standard of review that a court would use under the Public Records Act, i.e., that disclosure would be granted unless the public interest served by not disclosing the information clearly outweighs the public interest served by disclosing the information. Obviously, if there is another applicable provision of law that would exempt the information, the commission (and a court hearing a petition under the PRA) must deny the request for disclosure. It should be noted that the commission's discretion to grant the request for information under these circumstances is predicated on first finding that disclosure will not result in an unfair competitive disadvantage to the party that submitted the information. This is a fairly high hurdle to jump, so that in most cases, if a party that submitted the requested information can make a colorable claim that disclosure would result in "unfair competitive disadvantage" to that party, the commission will deny the request. Opponents of the bill believe otherwise. They state that once information has been determined to be confidential, it should remain so, and the market participant should not be required to repeatedly defend the confidentiality of information. [Letter of opposition from Sempra Energy dated April 14, 2003.] This may make sense, except that under existing law, the party submitting the confidential information must already show that disclosure of the requested disaggregated or unmasked information will result in unfair competitive disadvantage to the submitter. If the submitter fails that test, then the commission, in the absence of the balancing test using public interests, may grant the request. In that case, the submitter will probably end up in court, where the court would apply that same balancing test that it applies to cases involving the Public Records Act. By allowing the commission to apply the test after a finding that the submitter of information failed to show unfair competitive disadvantage resulting from disclosure, the submitter would have a preview of how a court may look at the public interests involved, and may save itself the trouble of going to court. 3. Suggested amendment SB 772 (Bowen) Page 6 In order to ensure that information withheld or made confidential by the ERCDC either through a case-by-case basis or through a categorical designation remains confidential and exempt from disclosure under the Public Records Act, the author may want to include a provision to that effect. The same type of amendment has been used in other legislation dealing with confidential information received or maintained by public agencies, where it would be impractical to include such information as an exemption to the PRA within the Act itself. The following amendment is suggested: Add a subdivision (f) to read: (f) Information withheld by the commission pursuant to this section is not subject to disclosure under the Public Records Act (Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 6250) of Division 7 of Title 1 of the Government Code). 4. Conflict with AB 808 AB 808 (Richman) would create a new Department of Energy that would take over the responsibilities of various agencies, including the State ERCDC. The bill would repeal Section 25322 of the Public Resources Code. Support: None Known Opposition: Sempra Energy, Inc. HISTORY Source: Author Related Pending Legislation: None Known Prior Legislation: SB 1389 (Bowen, Chapter 568, Statutes of 2002) See Background ************** SB 772 (Bowen) Page 7