BILL ANALYSIS
SB 659
Page 1
Date of Hearing: August 4, 2004
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Judy Chu, Chair
SB 659 (Soto) - As Amended: June 1, 2004
Policy Committee:
UtilitiesVote:12-0
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program:
No Reimbursable:
SUMMARY
This bill repeals provisions in existing law that require an
expedited rehearing and expedited judicial review of any
challenges to Public Utilities Commission (PUC) decisions
arising out of the implementation of ABX1 1 (Keeley)--Chapter
4/Statutes of 2001.
FISCAL EFFECT
Any additional costs to the PUC for additional rehearings and/or
judicial reviews would be minor and absorbable.
COMMENTS
Background and Purpose . During the energy crisis, the enactment
of ABX1 1 allowed the Department of Water Resources (DWR) to
purchase electricity on behalf of the state's Investor Owned
Utilities (IOUs) and to recover its costs through the sale of
revenue bonds to be repaid by IOU's ratepayers. That bill also:
(1) required the PUC to set electricity rates to cover DWR's
power purchasing costs, (2) prohibited any future rate increase
for residential customers for usage under 130 percent of
baseline quantities, and (3) prohibited DWR from entering into
any power procurement contracts after January 1, 2003.
After ABX1 1 was enacted, concerns were raised that the revenue
bonds could not be issued until proceedings at the PUC were
final and no longer subject to rehearing or judicial review.
(Normal rehearing and judicial review procedures could have
resulted in delays in issuing the bonds.) To address these
concerns, SBX1 31, (Burton)--Chapter 9/Statutes of 2001 provided
SB 659
Page 2
for an expedited rehearing and judicial review process for all
issues relating to ABX1 1, including provisions not directly
related to the issuance of bonds. The revenue bonds have since
been issued, DWR is no longer entering into new power purchase
contracts, the DWR contracts have been assigned to the IOUs,
and the PUC has made several decisions relating to the
allocation of DWR's power purchase costs.
The sponsors of this bill--The Utility Reform Network (TURN)--
believe that since the purpose of the expedited review
procedures was to allow the revenue bonds to be sold quickly and
the bond sales are now complete, there is no need for a
continued authorization for expedited review. They believe that
any review of decisions relating to other provision in ABX1 1
should be handled under the regular rehearing and judicial
review process.
Analysis Prepared by : Chuck Nicol / APPR. / (916) 319-2081