BILL ANALYSIS SB 659 Page 1 Date of Hearing: August 4, 2004 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS Judy Chu, Chair SB 659 (Soto) - As Amended: June 1, 2004 Policy Committee: UtilitiesVote:12-0 Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program: No Reimbursable: SUMMARY This bill repeals provisions in existing law that require an expedited rehearing and expedited judicial review of any challenges to Public Utilities Commission (PUC) decisions arising out of the implementation of ABX1 1 (Keeley)--Chapter 4/Statutes of 2001. FISCAL EFFECT Any additional costs to the PUC for additional rehearings and/or judicial reviews would be minor and absorbable. COMMENTS Background and Purpose . During the energy crisis, the enactment of ABX1 1 allowed the Department of Water Resources (DWR) to purchase electricity on behalf of the state's Investor Owned Utilities (IOUs) and to recover its costs through the sale of revenue bonds to be repaid by IOU's ratepayers. That bill also: (1) required the PUC to set electricity rates to cover DWR's power purchasing costs, (2) prohibited any future rate increase for residential customers for usage under 130 percent of baseline quantities, and (3) prohibited DWR from entering into any power procurement contracts after January 1, 2003. After ABX1 1 was enacted, concerns were raised that the revenue bonds could not be issued until proceedings at the PUC were final and no longer subject to rehearing or judicial review. (Normal rehearing and judicial review procedures could have resulted in delays in issuing the bonds.) To address these concerns, SBX1 31, (Burton)--Chapter 9/Statutes of 2001 provided SB 659 Page 2 for an expedited rehearing and judicial review process for all issues relating to ABX1 1, including provisions not directly related to the issuance of bonds. The revenue bonds have since been issued, DWR is no longer entering into new power purchase contracts, the DWR contracts have been assigned to the IOUs, and the PUC has made several decisions relating to the allocation of DWR's power purchase costs. The sponsors of this bill--The Utility Reform Network (TURN)-- believe that since the purpose of the expedited review procedures was to allow the revenue bonds to be sold quickly and the bond sales are now complete, there is no need for a continued authorization for expedited review. They believe that any review of decisions relating to other provision in ABX1 1 should be handled under the regular rehearing and judicial review process. Analysis Prepared by : Chuck Nicol / APPR. / (916) 319-2081