BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                       


           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                   SB 128|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 445-6614         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                                 THIRD READING


          Bill No:  SB 128
          Author:   Bowen (D), et al
          Amended:  3/10/03
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE ENERGY, U.&C. COMMITTEE  :  6-3, 4/8/03
          AYES:  Bowen, Alarcon, Dunn, Murray, Sher, Vasconcellos
          NOES:  Morrow, Battin, McClintock


           SUBJECT  :    Cellular telecommunications service

           SOURCE  :     Author


           DIGEST  :    This bill requires cellular telephone companies  
          to extend a minimum 30-day grace period to new customers  
          during which a customer may rescind the agreement and  
          terminate service, as specified.

           ANALYSIS  :    

          Current law permits states to establish consumer protection  
          rules for cellular telephone service customers (Section  
          332(c)(3)(A) of the Federal Communications Act).

          This bill requires cellular telephone companies to provide  
          new customers with a 30-day grace period within which a  
          customer could rescind their contract if they find the  
          cellular service quality is unsatisfactory.  Customers are  
          required to pay for any services used prior to rescinding  
          the contract.

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                SB 128
                                                                Page  
          2

          This bill does not apply to commercial accounts, as  
          defined, or month-to-month contracts.

           Background
           
          Cellular telephone use has grown very rapidly across the  
          country in recent years and in California, the number of  
          wireless customers has jumped by 29% since 2000.  One out  
          of every nine cellular customers nationwide are in  
          California.  Cellular telephones are becoming as prevalent  
          as traditional telephones, with about 16 million cellular  
          telephones in California compared to 26 million traditional  
          telephones.

          The growth in cellular usage has been accompanied by a  
          growth in the number of complaints about cellular service.   
          Complaints to the California Public Utilities Commission  
          (CPUC) nearly doubled from 5,235 to 9,964 between 2000 and  
          2001, though the number dropped slightly in 2002.   
          "Consumer Reports" magazine found last year that Americans  
          consistently rated their cellular phone service as  
          mediocre.  This year, the magazine noted the overall  
          satisfaction with cellular carriers is lower than for most  
          other businesses that they rate.  In a survey conducted in  
          conjunction with the article, poor phone service was the  
          leading reason cited by people for switching providers.

          The major cellular providers require customers to sign  
          long-term contracts for service. Those contracts are  
          typically one year long, though some providers now require  
          two-year contracts.  All of the major cellular providers  
          have voluntarily given customers a grace period during  
          which the customer can return the phone and discontinue  
          service without being subject to a contract cancellation  
          fee.

          The CPUC is in the midst of an investigation to establish  
          customer service rules, some of which may apply to wireless  
          service providers.  A first draft of those rules was  
          released in June 2002 and includes a provision giving  
          customers 30 days to cancel a contract for service without  
          penalty.  The cellular telephone companies opposed this  
          provision and a number of other provisions of the draft  
          rules during CPUC workshops in August 2002 and in numerous  







                                                                SB 128
                                                                Page  
          3

          meetings with commissioners.  A revised draft of the rules  
          is expected next month.

           Comments  

          Proponents note that every cellular telephone company  
          provides coverage maps to show where their service is  
          available.  However, those maps are very generalized and  
          are not guarantees of coverage.  A customer's ability to  
          complete or continue a call in a given location can vary  
          depending on the time of year, the height of the buildings  
          in a given area, call volumes, radio interference, and  
          phone quality.  In the absence of accurate maps, the only  
          way for a customer to know if the cellular phone meets  
          their needs is to use it for a period of time.  If a  
          customer is required to sign a long-term contract to obtain  
          service, that customer is potentially stuck if he or she  
          finds the service is less than was advertised or promised.   
          This bill guarantees customers a reasonable way to get out  
          of a long-term contract commitment if the product they  
          bought doesn't live up to their expectations or to the  
          promises made by the carrier.

          The Cellular Telecommunications & Internet Association  
          (CTIA) believes SB 128 will undermine consumer benefits,  
          add considerable paperwork burdens, increase service costs,  
          and limit choices without providing any meaningful consumer  
          benefit.

          Most products sold in California are covered by the  
          Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act that provides buyers  
          with a 60-day implied warranty of fitness.  Because a  
          contract for wireless service is a "service" and not a  
          "product," those contracts aren't covered by the  
          Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act.

          While opponents note that many cellular companies offer  
          14-day cancellation policies with their contracts, those  
          policies aren't uniform and they can be changed at any  
          time.  This bill provides a statutory 30-day cancellation  
          policy, so a person signing a contract will know they have  
          30 days to cancel the contract, regardless of which company  
          they buy service from, if the service doesn't live up to  
          the company's promises or the customer's expectations.







                                                                SB 128
                                                                Page  
          4


           Related legislation
           
          AB 1379 (Calderon), is pending in the Assembly Utilities  
          and Commerce Committee.  That bill gives customers a 14-day  
          right-of-rescission that's triggered when the customer  
          receives their first bill.

          SB 1601 (Bowen) of 2002 was substantially similar to SB  
          128.  SB 1601 was approved by the Senate on a 23-13 vote.   
          The right-of-rescission period was shortened from 30 days  
          to 14 days in the Assembly and the author opted not to take  
          the bill up for a concurrence vote on the Senate floor.

          FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  No    
          Local:  No

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  4/8/03)

          California Alliance For Consumer Protection
          Office of Ratepayer Advocates

           OPPOSITION  :    (Verified  4/8/03)

          The Cellular Telecommunications and Internet Association



          NC:nl  04/10/03   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****