BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                       


           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                    SB 67|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 445-6614         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                              UNFINISHED BUSINESS


          Bill No:  SB 67
          Author:   Bowen (D)
          Amended:  9/8/03 
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE ENERGY, U.&C. COMMITTEE  :  7-2, 4/8/03
          AYES:  Bowen, Alarcon, Battin, Dunn, Murray, Sher,  
            Vasconcellos
          NOES:  Morrow, McClintock

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  Senate Rule 28.8

           SENATE FLOOR  :  29-11, 6/2/03
          AYES:  Alarcon, Alpert, Ashburn, Battin, Bowen, Burton,  
            Cedillo, Chesbro, Ducheny, Dunn, Escutia, Figueroa,  
            Florez, Karnette, Kuehl, Machado, Margett, McPherson,  
            Murray, Ortiz, Perata, Romero, Scott, Sher, Soto, Speier,  
            Torlakson, Vasconcellos, Vincent
          NOES:  Aanestad, Ackerman, Brulte, Denham, Hollingsworth,  
            Johnson, Knight, McClintock, Morrow, Oller, Poochigian

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  48-28, 9/8/03 - See last page for vote


           SUBJECT  :    Energy:  California Renewables Portfolio  
          Standard Program

           SOURCE  :     Author


           DIGEST  :    This bill establishes, for the State Public  
          Utilities Commission, an alternative credit test when  
          requiring procurement to fulfill the renewable portfolio  
                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                 SB 67
                                                                Page  
          2

          standard (RPS) requirements.

           Assembly Amendments  (1) add a provision to prohibit Pacific  
          Gas and Electric (PG&E) from commencing RPS procurement  
          activities until 4/1/04, and (2) expand the definition of  
          "eligible renewable energy resource" to include facilities  
          located outside the state, as specified.

           ANALYSIS  :    Existing law, Section 701.3 of the Public  
          Utilities Code, requires the State Public Utilities  
          Commission (PUC) to reserve a portion of future electrical  
          generating capacity for renewable resources.

          Existing law, Section 454.5 of the Public Utilities Code,  
          requires investor-owned utilities (IOUs) to buy renewable  
          resources with the goal of increasing their existing level  
          of renewable resources by one percent per year until a 20  
          percent renewable resources portfolio is achieved.

          Existing law, SB 1078 (Sher), Chapter 516, Statutes of  
          2002, the "Renewable Portfolio Standard" or RPS, requires  
          IOUs to meet essentially the same renewable procurement  
          goals as Section 454.5, but sets a deadline of 2017 for  
          achieving a 20 percent renewable portfolio and establishes  
          a detailed process and standards for renewable procurement.  
           

          Under the RPS, the PUC is prohibited from requiring an IOU  
          to buy renewable resources to fulfill the RPS until the IOU  
          has attained an investment grade credit rating as  
          determined by at least two major rating agencies.

          This bill:

          1. Permits the PUC to require the IOUs to begin meeting the  
             procurement requirements of the RPS when either (a) IOU  
             has obtained an investment grade credit rating as  
             determined by at least two major rating agencies, or (b)  
             IOU is able to procure eligible renewable energy  
             resources on reasonable terms and the procurement will  
             not impair the restoration IOU's creditworthiness.   
             Applicability of this second provision is delayed until  
             after 4/1/04, for any IOU that, as of 6/30/03, was in  
             federal bankruptcy court.  [This provision applies to  







                                                                 SB 67
                                                                Page  
          3

             PG&E.] 

          2. Allows the PUC to consider renewable energy purchased by  
             an IOU from a facility located outside the state and  
             meeting specified requirements as meeting RPS. 

           Background
           
          AB 57 (Wright), Chapter 835, Statutes of 2002, established  
          a process under which an IOU may be assured its electricity  
          procurement expenses will be recoverable in customer rates,  
          if the procurement is conducted consistent with a  
          PUC-approved procurement plan.  AB 57 included a  
          requirement that IOUs buy renewable resources with the goal  
          of increasing their existing level of renewable resources  
          by one percent per year of electricity sold until a 20  
          percent renewable resources portfolio is achieved.  Like  
          the RPS, the AB 57 requirement to buy renewable energy is  
          limited by the availability of Public Goods Charge funds to  
          subsidize above-market costs.  The AB 57 renewable  
          procurement requirements are not explicitly contingent on  
          rating agency decisions.

          In August 2002, in anticipation of AB 57 and the RPS, the  
          PUC issued an interim procurement order requiring each IOU  
          to buy renewable energy to achieve the one percent annual  
          increase contemplated in the legislation.  The PUC relied  
          on its general authority and the direction provided by  
          Section 701.3 to require the IOUs to procure renewable  
          resources.  Non-creditworthy IOUs were authorized to enter  
          contracts in partnership with the State Department of Water  
          Resources (DWR).  While Pacific Gas and Electric's (PG&E)  
          renewable procurement relied on DWR credit backing,  
          Southern California Edison's (SCE) did not.

          SB 1078, which took effect January 1, 2003, prohibits the  
          PUC from requiring an IOU to conduct procurement to fulfill  
          the renewable portfolio standard until at least two "major  
          rating agencies" give it an investment grade credit rating.  
           PG&E and SCE don't meet this condition currently.  It is  
          unlikely PG&E will meet this condition until some time  
          after its bankruptcy reorganization is resolved, which may  
          result in a delay of its implementation of the RPS. 








                                                                 SB 67
                                                                Page  
          4

          According to the author's office, the purpose of the RPS is  
          undermined by making its implementation contingent on the  
          decisions of credit rating agencies.  This bill corrects  
          that problem and allows renewable procurement to proceed on  
          terms which are reasonable and acceptable to the buyer, the  
          seller and the PUC.

          SB 1078 limits the renewable resources that could be  
          counted toward RPS to in-state renewable resources.  This  
          prohibition against out-of-state production may violate the  
          Commerce Clause in the United States Constitution and may  
          act to limit competition to provide low cost renewable  
          power.  SB 67 addresses these concerns by allowing  
          out-of-state renewable resources to count toward RPS if  
          they meet specified requirements. 

           PG&E's Bankruptcy Status  .  A settlement agreement in PG&E's  
          bankruptcy proceeding was recently announced, which still  
          must be approved by the PUC, PG&E's Board of Directors and  
          the Bankruptcy Court.  If the process goes according to  
          plan, the agreement should be approved by January 2004,  
          with investment grade credit ratings following shortly  
          thereafter. 

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    
          Local:  No

          Minor, absorbable special fund costs to PUC.

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  9/4/03)

          California Wind Energy Association
          County of Santa Cruz
          Office of Ratepayer Advocates
          Southern California Edison
          State Public Utilities Commission
          The Utility Reform Network


          ASSEMBLY FLOOR  : 
          AYES:  Benoit, Berg, Bermudez, Calderon, Canciamilla, Chan,  
            Chavez, Chu, Cohn, Corbett, Correa, Diaz, Dutra, Dymally,  
            Frommer, Goldberg, Hancock, Jerome Horton, Jackson,  
            Kehoe, Koretz, Laird, Leno, Levine, Lieber, Liu,  







                                                                 SB 67
                                                                Page  
          5

            Longville, Lowenthal, Matthews, Montanez, Mullin, Nakano,  
            Nation, Negrete McLeod, Nunez, Oropeza, Parra, Pavley,  
            Reyes, Ridley-Thomas, Salinas, Simitian, Steinberg,  
            Vargas, Wiggins, Wolk, Yee, Wesson
          NOES:  Aghazarian, Bates, Bogh, Cox, Daucher, Dutton,  
            Garcia, Harman, Haynes, Shirley Horton, Houston, Keene,  
            La Malfa, La Suer, Leslie, Maddox, Maze, McCarthy,  
            Mountjoy, Nakanishi, Pacheco, Plescia, Richman, Runner,  
            Samuelian, Spitzer, Strickland, Wyland


          NC:mel  9/10/03   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****