BILL ANALYSIS
Appropriations Committee Fiscal Summary
6 (Battin)
Hearing Date: 7/14/03 Amended: 6/18/03
Consultant: Lisa Matocq Policy Vote: C A 3-0
E & R 3-1
E, U & C 8-0
_______________________________________________________________
BILL SUMMARY: SCA 6, subject to voter approval, (1)
requires commissioners of the Public Utilities Commission
(PUC) to be elected, rather than appointed, (2) increases
the number of commissioners from five to seven, and (3)
requires the state to be divided into seven districts, as
specified.
Fiscal Impact (in thousands)
Major Provisions 2003-04 2004-05
2005-06 Fund
PUC - salaries, district Unknown costs, potentially
$1,050-3,400 Special*
offices, equipment, etc. annually, beg. 2006-07
Election costs - SOS $300-400 one-time in 2004-05 and less
General
than $50 in 2006-07
*Public Utilities' Reimbursement Account
STAFF COMMENTS: This bill meets the criteria for referral
to the Suspense File. The California Constitution
provides for a five-member PUC, and six-year terms. This
bill changes the term to four-years, coinciding with
gubernatorial elections. If approved by voters, candidates
would run for office in 2006.
A commissioner's salary is approximately $142,740 annual,
including benefits. Each commissioner has four advisors,
and two clerical staff. Therefore, increased costs for the
two new commissioners is $1.05 million annually. The State
Board of Equalization members maintain district offices.
If the PUC opened and staffed seven new district offices,
increased costs could be $157,000 one-time for equipment,
and $216,000 to $2.39 million annually for salaries,
depending on the number of additional staff needed.
PURA revenues are derived from an annual fee imposed on
utilities. Therefore, increased costs to the PUC may be
recovered through increased fee revenues. However, the PUC
would need at least 12 additional personnel years to
implement this bill. Increased costs to the Secretary of
State (SOS) to put the constitutional amendment on the
ballot could be $300,000-$400,000, depending on the number
of additional pages required in the ballot pamphlet. In
addition, there may be increased election costs to
counties, which would not be considered a state mandate.