BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  AB 2918
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:  April 19, 2004

                    ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON UTILITIES AND COMMERCE
                                 Sarah Reyes, Chair
                    AB 2918 (Laird) - As Amended:  April 15, 2004
           
          SUBJECT  :  Desalination facilities:  electricity rates.

           SUMMARY :  Requires the California Public Utilities Commission  
          (CPUC) to initiate a proceeding to determine the feasibility and  
          cost of exempting desalination facilities from specified  
          charges.  Specifically,  this bill  :

          1)Finds and declares that the state's water supply problem  
            cannot be solved by additional supplies of clean fresh water  
            and that desalination technology might address fresh water  
            shortages mitigating the environmental impacts of building  
            dams and reservoirs to store water.

          2)Declares the high costs of desalination technology are partly  
            due to the amount of electricity used during the desalination  
            process as well as the costs of the electricity.

          3)Declares that since no major desalination technology was in  
            existence during and after the energy crisis that desalination  
            plants should be exempt for costs incurred during the  
            electricity crisis as a result of the state procuring power on  
            behalf of creditless electrical corporations.

          4)Declares that predictable long term electricity for  
            desalination facilities will aid local water agencies and  
            regulated water corporations in addressing the state's water  
            problems.

          5)Requires CPUC to initiate a quasi legislative proceeding by no  
            later than July 1, 2005 or determine at the next general rate  
            case for each electrical corporation the feasibility of  
            establishing a separate rate class for desalination plants  
            operated by public agencies or regulated utilities which were  
            placed in service after January 1, 2006.

          6)Requires CPUC to determine in this proceeding the costs and  
            benefits associated with exempting public agencies or  
            regulated utilities operating a desalination facility from  
            Department of Water Resources (DWR) bond and power contract  








                                                                  AB 2918
                                                                  Page  2

            costs and any utility undercollections or bankruptcy related  
            charges, including historical procurement costs associated  
            with deregulation.

          7)Requires CPUC to consider in its proceeding whether  
            desalination facilities employs programs to shift electricity  
            consumption to off peak demand periods, including  
            interruptible or curtailment service programs, and use of real  
            time metering.

           EXISTING LAW:  

          1)Suspends direct transactions until DWR no longer supplies  
            power.

          2)Establishes the process for CPUC to initiate proceedings and  
            provide notification to the public prior to decisions being  
            made.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  Unknown.

           COMMENTS  :  This bill requires CPUC to initiate a quasi  
          legislative proceeding or determine in the general rate case for  
          each investor owned utility (IOU) the feasibility and costs  
          associated with establishing a separate rate class for  
          desalination facilities and exempting them from all costs  
          associated with deregulation and the energy crisis.  From time  
          to time, CPUC is asked to develop a separate rate class for  
          customers.  In some cases this may result in ratepayer  
          indifference or costs shifts.  An example of a separate rate  
          class created for customers during an IOUs general rate case is  
          the agricultural rate class.

           This bill should include declaratory language prohibiting cost  
          shifting.   This bill should include declaratory language to  
          prohibit costs shifting to other customer classes as a result of  
          establishing a new rate class for desalination facilities and  
          exempting them from costs associated with deregulation or the  
          energy crisis.

          Also, the declaratory language in this bill referencing costs  
          associated with the energy crisis should be deleted to ensure  
          the Legislature's objectivity regarding the issue of exempting  
          desalination facilities from cost recovery.









                                                                  AB 2918
                                                                  Page  3

           REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :   

           Support 
           
          None on file.

           Opposition 
           
          None on file.
           

          Analysis Prepared by  :    Daniel Kim / U. & C. / (916) 319-2083