BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  AB 2869
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:  May 3, 2004

                    ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON UTILITIES AND COMMERCE
                                 Sarah Reyes, Chair
                    AB 2869 (Levine) - As Amended:  April 29, 2004
           
          SUBJECT  :  Public utilities.

           SUMMARY  :  Exempts customers of a utility from paying specified  
          charges established by either the board of the local publicly  
          owned electric utility or the California Public Utilities  
          Commission (CPUC) as provided in this bill.  Specifically,  this  
          bill  :

          1)Exempts customers affected by a utility completing a mutually  
            agreeable condemnation process of distribution facilities of  
            another utility if the following conditions are met:

             a)   The mutual agreeable condemnation process is related to  
               a city or county annexation or detachment, and

             b)   That the condemnation process was initiated prior to  
               February 1, 2000.

          2)Specifies that the customer exemption applies to payment of  
            severance fees or charges established by either the board of  
            the local publicly owned electric utility or CPUC.

           EXISTING LAW  requires CPUC to develop a nonbypassable surcharge  
          for competition transition charges, historical procurement  
          charges, electrical corporation undercollections, and Department  
          of Water Resources (DWR) power procurement and bond charges.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  Unknown.

           COMMENTS  :  The sponsors of this bill, Los Angeles Department of  
          Water and Power (LADWP), state that this bill is needed to  
          prevent customers who are scheduled to be annexed to their  
          territory from Edison's service territory from paying exit fees.  
           The reasons for the exemption is that LADWP has an arrangement  
          with Edison (SCE) that goes back to the 1930's to reciprocally  
          serve each other's customers in situations where the lack of  
          existing infrastructure and facilities make such arrangements  
          more economically feasible.  The utilities in turn bill each  
          other for the combined total electricity consumption of each  








                                                                  AB 2869
                                                                  Page  2

          others "fringe" customers.  The term "fringe" comes from the  
          fact that these customers are located along the fringes between  
          LADWP and SCE service territories.

          LADWP is scheduled to annex parts of SCE service territory based  
          on a mutual condemnation agreement that will result in some  
          "fringe" customers moving from service with SCE to LADWP.  Since  
          these customers were only serviced by SCE as a result of the  
          reciprocal agreement between the utilities they should be exempt  
          from paying any exit fees agreed to between both utilities.

           Will this bill result in any other customers in Pacific Gas &  
          Electric or San Diego Gas & Electric service territory to be  
          exempt from exit fees?   The intent of this bill is to only deal  
          with the exemption of exit fees for customers serviced by the  
          distribution system of SCE if the power was procured and paid  
          for by LADWP through a reciprocal agreement.  Will the passage  
          of this bill result in providing exit fee exemptions to other  
          investor owned utility customers?

           Technical amendment suggested by committee staff.   This bill  
          should be amended to only apply to the provisions of subdivision  
          (b) of Section 9601, since the intent of this bill is to exempt  
          charges paid to the electrical corporation versus to charges  
          paid to a local publicly owned utility.

           REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :   

           Support 
           
          Los Angeles Department of Water and Power (sponsor)

           Opposition 
           
          None on file.
           

          Analysis Prepared by  :    Daniel Kim / U. & C. / (916) 319-2083