BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  AB 2803
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   April 12, 2004

                    ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON UTILITIES AND COMMERCE
                                 Sarah Reyes, Chair
                    AB 2803 (Horton) - As Amended:  March 26, 2006
           
          SUBJECT  :   Public Utilities Commission: Office of Economic  
          Development

           SUMMARY  :   Establishes the Office of Economic Development (OED)  
          as a division within the California Public Utilities Commission  
          (CPUC).  Specifically,  this bill  :  

          1)Establishes the OED as a division within the CPUC to review  
            and assess the beneficial and adverse economic impacts,  
            intended and unintended, of CPUC decisions and orders.  The  
            goal of the OED is to assist the CPUC in making decisions that  
            will promote economic development and to avoid making  
            decisions that will suppress economic development.

          2)Defines "adverse economic impacts" as increasing costs,  
            raising prices, loss of jobs or employment opportunities,  
            reducing technological innovation or investment in  
            technological innovation, reducing investment in  
            infrastructure to serve consumers, and reducing consumer  
            choices.

          3)Defines "beneficial economic impacts" as increased efficiency,  
            reduced costs, reduced prices, technological innovation,  
            increased employment, increased consumer choices, and  
            increased information reasonably available to consumers to  
            make informed choices.  

          4)Repeals existing law prohibiting the CPUC from establishing a  
            separate office for the purpose of evaluating economic  
            development consequences of CPUC activities.

           EXISTING LAW  

          1)States the intent of the Legislature that the CPUC assess the  
            economic effects or consequences of its decisions as part of  
            each ratemaking, rulemaking, or other proceeding.

          2)Prohibits the CPUC from creating a separate office to evaluate  
            economic development consequences of CPUC activities.








                                                                  AB 2803
                                                                  Page  2


           FISCAL EFFECT  :   Unknown.

           COMMENTS  :   The CPUC regulates a varying array of public  
          utilities and activities, ranging from electricity and natural  
          gas to hot air balloons and railroad crossing.  CPUC regulatory  
          decision can affect a broad range of issues.  CPUC regulations  
          can promote low rates and consumer protection and can advance  
          reliable and high quality service.  The CPUC also has  
          enforcement powers and can levy fines to punish companies that  
          defraud customers or intentionally offer subpar service. As with  
          any regulatory agency, consequences of CPUC actions will  
          necessarily also have economic development impacts. 

          This bill creates an office within the CPUC with the sole job of  
          assessing the economic impacts of CPUC decisions. 

          Unlike most state agencies, all major decisions made at the CPUC  
          are completed through a trial like proceeding where all parties  
          are allowed to submit testimony and the final decision is based  
          on highly developed record.  This procedure allows all parties  
          to submit testimony regarding all aspects of the proceeding,  
          including the economic impact of the action. 

          Supporters of this bill believe that establishing an OED would  
          ensure that policies and regulations created at the CPUC would  
          enhance investment and development in California. The bill does  
          create an office to assist the CPUC in assessing the economic  
          impacts of CPUC decision, but final decisions will still lie  
          with the Commissioners who make their determinations based on a  
          broad range of issues and the fully developed record.  Given the  
          comprehensive rule making process already in place at the CPUC,  
          there is little evidence that the creation of an OED will  
          provide any additional assurance that economic impacts will be  
          evaluated any differently than they are today. 

           Amendments
           
          Given the state's current fiscal situation, the committee may  
          wish to consider amending the bill to require that the OED be  
          funded through existing CPUC revenues and prohibit the CPUC from  
          funding the OED through increased rate surcharges.

           REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :   









                                                                  AB 2803
                                                                  Page  3

           Support 
           
          California Chamber of Commerce
          California Independent Grocers & Convenience Stores (CIGCS)
          California Manufacturers & Technology Association (CMTA)
          Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E)
          SBC
          Sempra
          Verizon

           Opposition 
           
          The Utility Reform Network (TURN)

           
          Analysis Prepared by  :    Edward Randolph / U. & C. / (916)  
          319-2083