BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  AB 2591
                                                                  Page  1

          ASSEMBLY THIRD READING
          AB 2591 (Leno) 
          As Amended May 17, 2004
          Majority vote 

           LOCAL GOVERNMENT    9-0         TRANSPORTATION      8-1         
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Salinas, Lieber, Daucher, |Ayes:|Oropeza, Houston, Bates,  |
          |     |Garcia,                   |     |Chan, Firebaugh, Pavley,  |
          |     |La Suer, Leno, Mullin,    |     |Salinas, Simitian         |
          |     |Steinberg, Diaz           |     |                          |
          |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
          |     |                          |Nays:|Mountjoy                  |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           
          SUMMARY  :  Strengthens the enforcement authority of local  
          governments in the regulation of charter-party carriers.   
          Specifically,  this bill  :  

          1)Authorizes a city, county, or city and county to impose  
            reasonable rules for the inspection of waybills of  
            charter-party carriers of passengers operating within the  
            jurisdiction of that local government, for purposes of  
            verifying valid prearranged travel.

          2)Requires every charter party carrier of passengers to include  
            all of the following on a waybill or trip report to ensure  
            that the transportation was prearranged:

             a)   The name of at least one passenger in the traveling  
               party, or identifying information of the traveling party's  
               affiliation;

             b)   The point of origin and destination of the passenger or  
               traveling party; and,

             c)   Information as to whether the travel was arranged by  
               telephone or written contract.

          1)Authorizes a peace officer to impound the vehicle of a person  
            arrested for operating a charter-party carrier of passengers  
            as a taxicab.









                                                                  AB 2591
                                                                  Page  2

          2)Deletes the existing graduated fine structure for persons  
            convicted of operating a charter-party carrier of passengers  
            or a taxicab without a valid certificate or permit and instead  
            requires the court to impose a mandatory fine of not more than  
            $5,000 per offense.

          3)Authorizes the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC)  
            to impose a fine of up to $5,000 for each violation upon a  
            person or corporation found to be operating a charter-party  
            carrier of passengers as a taxicab without a valid certificate  
            or permit in violation of a local ordinance or resolution.

           EXISTING LAW  :

          1)Authorizes, under the Charter-Party Carriers' Act (Act), CPUC  
            to issue operating authority and to regulate every  
            charter-party carrier of passengers, including limousines for  
            hire, that operates in the state.

          2)Authorizes a city, county, or city and county to adopt and  
            enforce reasonable rules and regulations pertaining to  
            operations within its boundaries for any charter-party carrier  
            domiciled or maintaining a business office within that city,  
            county, or city and county.

          3)Prohibits a charter-party carrier from engaging in taxicab  
            transportation service licensed and regulated by a city or  
            county.

          4)Prohibits local governments from adopting license, permit,  
            fee, and other requirements on charter-party carriers  
            operating a limousine.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  Unknown

           COMMENTS  :  The author has introduced this bill in an effort to  
          address problems on the local level with the regulation of  
          limousine operators.  Charter-party carriers, including  
          limousines, are passenger carriers who provide prearranged  
          transportation service within the state.  The Act, enacted in  
          the early 1960s, establishes CPUC as a regulatory body that  
          issues permits for this type of passenger carrier operation, and  
          establishes financial responsibility criteria, rate criteria,  
          and other operating requirements.  According to the author and  
          proponents of this bill, CPUC has been less than effective in  








                                                                  AB 2591
                                                                  Page  3

          discharging its responsibilities.

          In response to allegations of the proliferation of renegade or  
          bandit limousine operators acting illegally as taxicabs, the  
          author wants to strengthen local governments' enforcement  
          authority in the regulation of charter-party carriers acting as  
          limousines.  This bill specifies the required contents of a  
          waybill, which acts as proof that passenger rides are  
          prearranged, enhances the fines for illegal operators, and  
          provides for local authority to inspect charter-party carrier  
          waybills and to impound the vehicles of illegal operators.   
          Existing law authorizes local governments to adopt and enforce  
          any reasonable rules and regulations pertaining to the operation  
          of charter-party carriers within its boundaries.

          The author and supporters contend that the current system of  
          regulation and enforcement of charter-party carriers is  
          inadequate and ineffective.  The taxicab and limousine  
          industries have both been faced with a proliferation of illegal  
          operators who fail to get CPUC operating authority or proper  
          insurance, and undercut the rates of legitimate operators.   
          Illegal operators do not follow basic safety and insurance  
          regulations required by CPUC, do not pay for the state  
          regulation of limousines, and pose a variety of hazards to  
          passengers and other drivers.  Proponents contend that this bill  
          will help control the longstanding illegal and unfair practices  
          of limousine drivers who operate as taxicabs by not adhering to  
          the requirement that their services have been prearranged.   
          Supporters assert that limousines have been stealing fares from  
          taxicabs from hotels, airports, and increasingly while customers  
          are hailing off the street.  The author and supporters note that  
          CPUC lacks the resources or personnel to do more than minimal  
          enforcement, and that local governments' efforts have been  
          largely ineffective due to the inadequacy of existing  
          regulations.  They contend that this bill will enhance public  
          safety and confidence, mitigate the economic harm of illegal  
          activities, and reduce the regulatory burden on CPUC.  The  
          limousine industry supports increased penalties and enforcement  
          efforts, since illegal operators affect their business as well.


           Analysis Prepared by  :    Mark McKenzie / L. GOV. / (916)  
          319-3958 

                                                                FN: 0005418








                                                                  AB 2591
                                                                  Page  4