BILL ANALYSIS 1
SENATE ENERGY, UTILITIES AND COMMUNICATIONS COMMITTEE
DEBRA BOWEN, CHAIRWOMAN
AB 2499 - Jerome Horton Hearing Date:
June 22, 2004 A
As Amended: June 16, 2004 FISCAL B
2
4
9
9
DESCRIPTION
This bill requires new publicly owned electric utilities (new
munis commencing service after January 1, 2001) to meet equivalent
requirements for "resource adequacy" as applicable to
investor-owned utilities (IOUs), and to meet the following
conditions before providing service in any new area:
1.The California Energy Commission (CEC) has determined if the new
muni's resource plan meets resource adequacy requirements.
2.The new muni's governing body finds:
its resource plan meets resource adequacy requirements,
the public interest and necessity require it to provide
service, and
the anticipated public good outweighs the reasonably
identified risks.
BACKGROUND
Pursuant to AB 57 (Wright), Chapter 835, Statutes of 2002, the
California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) issued a decision
governing IOU long-term procurement in January (Decision
04-01-050). While AB 57 requires IOU procurement plans to "enable
the (IOU) to fulfill its obligation to serve at just and
reasonable rates," AB 57 does not speak directly to resource
adequacy.
Nevertheless, the CPUC decision included provisions to implement
resource adequacy requirements, including mandatory minimum
reserve levels, for IOUs and other entities serving electric load
within IOUs' service territories, such as electric service
providers and community choice aggregators. The CPUC proposes
these load-serving entities must have adequate resources to serve
their load, plus achieve a reserve margin between 15-17 percent by
2008. The CPUC decision does not apply resource adequacy
requirements to munis, new or existing.
The IOUs do not now meet these resource adequacy standards and
there are no statutory definitions or obligations regarding
resource adequacy for any utility. Beyond directing the
California Power Authority to determine an appropriate statewide
reserve level as part of its mandate, the Legislature has not
provided specific guidance on the reserve issue.
COMMENTS
1.No statutory resource adequacy requirements. This bill requires
new munis to meet the same resource adequacy requirements as
IOUs. However, resource adequacy requirements for IOUs have
only been conceived by the CPUC, and not implemented. If they
are implemented pursuant to the recent CPUC decision, they will
apply to IOUs, but not munis.
The IOUs aren't now subject to any statutory resource adequacy
requirements, and this bill doesn't establish or define resource
adequacy requirements for either IOUs or munis. The bill
requires new munis to meet standards equivalent to standards
which don't really exist yet. AB 2006 (Nunez), pending in this
committee, establishes resource adequacy requirements, but
exempts munis.
This bill is somewhat unprecedented in that it would essentially
allow the CPUC to set resource adequacy standards for a muni
through a multi-layered process where the standards are set by
the CPUC, the CEC determines if the muni meet the CPUC
standards, and the muni's governing body considers the CEC's
determination and makes the final decision.
2.Unrelated intent language should be deleted. This bill includes
an intent statement telling the CPUC ensure there's no cost
shifting between IOUs and new munis (Subdivision (g) of Section
1, Page 3, Lines 24-27). This statement is related to an
operative provision which has been deleted from the bill. The
author and the committee may wish to consider whether this
statement should be deleted.
PRIOR VOTES
Assembly Floor (62-5)
Assembly Appropriations Committee (16-4)
Assembly Utilities and Commerce Committee (12-0)
POSITIONS
Sponsor:
Southern California Edison
Support:
Congress of California Seniors
Pacific Gas and Electric Company
Oppose:
California Municipal Utilities Association
City of Moreno Valley
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Sacramento Municipal Utility District
Southern California Public Power Authority (unless amended)
Lawrence Lingbloom
AB 2499 Analysis
Hearing Date: June 22, 2004