BILL ANALYSIS
AB 1407
Page 1
Date of Hearing: May 7, 2003
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Alan Lowenthal, Chair
AB 1407 (Wolk) - As Introduced: February 21, 2003
SUBJECT : Solar energy systems
SUMMARY : Prohibits a public entity from imposing restrictions
on real property that prohibit or restrict the installation or
use of a solar energy system. Specifically, this bill :
1)Prohibits a public entity from receiving state sponsored
grants or loans for solar energy programs if it prohibits or
places unreasonable restrictions on the placement of solar
energy systems.
2)Prohibits local public entities from exempting residents of
its jurisdiction from the laws prohibiting unreasonable
restrictions or the denial of installation of solar energy
systems.
EXISTING LAW
1)Prohibits any covenant, restriction, or condition contained in
any deed, contract, security instrument or other instrument
that effectively prohibits or restricts the installation or
use of a solar energy system.
2)Provides that reasonable restrictions may be placed on the
installation or use of solar energy systems provided they do
not significantly increase the cost by twenty percent or
decrease the efficiency by 20 percent. (Civil Code Section
714)
3)Allows the association of a common interest development to
restrict the installation of solar energy systems within the
common area, require the owner of a separate interest to
obtain approval prior to installing a system on their separate
interest, and require the maintenance, replacement or repair
of roofs or other building components. (Civil Code Section
714.1)
FISCAL EFFECT : Unknown.
AB 1407
Page 2
COMMENTS :
Background
According to the author, "Several jurisdictions in California
have established policies or procedures that make the
installation of solar energy systems difficult, if not
impossible." While existing law addresses this issue as it
relates to homeowner's associations it does not apply to cities,
counties or other public entities. Besides prohibiting these
entities from imposing these restrictions or limitations the
bill denies them from receiving state funds that are offered for
solar energy programs.
Staff Comments
The author's office indicates that some of the cities that have
had prior problems regarding the restriction or prohibition of
solar energy systems include Santa Barbara, Glendale, Palm
Springs, Lakewood, Yorba Linda, Cerritos, Fullerton, Long Beach,
and the County of Fresno. It was not clear what those specific
problems were and the author is working with the sponsor to
provide that information.
REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION :
Support
California Solar Energy Industries Association (Sponsor)
AMECO, Long Beach
EcoEnergies, Sunnyvale
GO Solar Company, North Hollywood
Light Energy Systems, Concord
Performance Solar Inc., Escondido
POCO Solar Energy, Santa Clara
Short Electric, Anza
Six Rivers Solar, Inc., Eureka
SoCal Solar Energy, Mission Viejo
Solarponics, Inc., Atascadero
Solar Wind Works, Truckee
SOLutions in Solar Electricity, Culver City
Sun Utility Network, Inc., Glendale
Opposition
None on file.
AB 1407
Page 3
Analysis Prepared by : Jay Barkman / H. & C.D. / (916)
319-2085