BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  AB 1326
                                                                  Page  1

          CONCURRENCE IN SENATE AMENDMENTS
          AB 1326 (Simitian)
          As Amended September 8, 2003
          Majority vote
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |ASSEMBLY:  |78-0 |(May 29, 2003)  |SENATE: |29-7 |(September 9,  |
          |           |     |                |        |     |2003)          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
            
           Original Committee Reference:    HUM. S.  

           SUMMARY  :  Creates a San Mateo County (County) child care subsidy  
          pilot project utilizing child care funds allocated to the County  
          from state and federal sources into a single countywide child  
          care delivery system.

           The Senate amendments  :

          1)Replace the specification of five funding sources with a  
            general inclusion of all sources used by direct service  
            contractors.

          2)Delete the requirement that the California Department of  
            Education (SDE) seek a waiver if the plan conflicts with  
            federal law.

          3)Require that the plan follow the current family fee schedule  
            established in state law for income-eligible families, but  
            allows different fees and copayments for families whose income  
            exceeds current eligibility levels.

          4)Require that the California Department of Social Services  
            (DSS) have an opportunity to review and comment upon the  
            proposed outcomes before they are submitted to the local child  
            care planning council.

          5)Require that the Legislative Analyst and Senate Office of  
            Research review the evaluation design and data to be used  
            before the plan is submitted to the local child care planning  
            council.

          6)Prevent new enrollment in the pilot program after the plan  
            terminates on January 1, 2009. 









                                                                  AB 1326
                                                                  Page  2

          7)Provide that the County shall increase the number of days of  
            enrollment in the first year by least two% for all contracts  
            where the contractors receive an increase in their  
            reimbursement rate.

           EXISTING LAW  :

          1)Establishes several programs providing subsidized child care  
            and development services administered by the SDE, and requires  
            the Superintendent of Public Instruction to adopt rules and  
            regulations on eligibility, enrollment, family fees, provider  
            rates and priority of services.

          2)Creates the California Work Opportunity and Responsibility to  
            Kids (CalWORKs) program and provides child care services for  
            adult recipients participating in welfare-to-work activities  
            in three stages, guaranteeing care for participants receiving  
            CalWORKs and for two years after leaving assistance, and  
            offering care in Stage III to the extent funding is available.

           AS PASSED BY THE ASSEMBLY  , this bill:

          1)Authorized the County to develop and implement a county child  
            care subsidy program using funding from identified sources:   
            general child care and development programs, state preschool  
            programs, CalWORKs Stages II and III, campus child care and  
            development and migrant child care.

          2)Required the County to develop an individualized child care  
            subsidy plan, consisting of several elements, including:

             a)   An assessment to identify the County's goal for its  
               child care system and an analysis of whether the current  
               structure of subsidized funding is consistent with that  
               goal;

             b)   Development of a local policy to eliminate state-imposed  
               regulatory barriers to the County's desired outcomes for  
               subsidized child care, including:  

               i)     Priority to families with the lowest incomes; and,

               ii)    Authority of the local policy to supersede state law  
                 regarding eligibility criteria, fees, reimbursement rates  
                 and methods of maximizing the efficient use of subsidy  








                                                                  AB 1326
                                                                  Page  3

                 funds.  The policy may not deny or reduce eligibility for  
                 CalWORKs Stage II care and must treat CalWORKs Stage III  
                 families as to eligibility and fees the same as other  
                 families receiving subsidized care.

             c)   Establishment of measurable outcomes to evaluate the  
               success of the program in achieving the county's goals.

          3)Required approval of the plan by the local child care planning  
            council, the County Board of Supervisors, and the Child  
            Development Division (CDD) of SDE.  SDE may disapprove only  
            those portions of the plan not conforming to the law creating  
            the pilot project.

          4)Required application for a waiver to the appropriate federal  
            agency if any provision of the plan conflicts with federal  
            law, and required CDD to compel the County to revise its plan  
            if a waiver is unobtainable.

          5)Required annual reports to the Legislature by CDD and the  
            County summarizing the success of the pilot project, with a  
            final report submitted by December 31, 2008. 

          6)Terminated the pilot project by January 1, 2009, followed by a  
            two-year phase-out of the program.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  According to the Senate and Assembly  
          Appropriations committees, first year costs of approximately  
          $25,000 and ongoing General Fund costs in the range of $100,000  
          for implementation and oversight by SDE.

           COMMENTS  :  This bill originates from child care advocates and  
          providers in San Mateo County.  It is intended to address the  
          concern that, according to the author, the division of child  
          care funding into several different programs and departments  
          using "statewide standards of eligibility, priority and  
          reimbursement ? do not reflect significant local differences in  
          living costs, unemployment rates, and child care demand,  
          shortages and costs". 

          The author contends that "[s]tate subsidized child care policies  
          fail to address subsidized child care needs in 'high-cost'  
          counties like San Mateo where the cost of living and doing  
          business is well beyond the state median."  The statewide  
          eligibility limit is 75% of the State Median Income (SMI), or  








                                                                  AB 1326
                                                                  Page  4

          $2,925 per month, which is only 43% of median income in San  
          Mateo County.  As a result, proponents contend that "[m]any  
          families truly need subsidized care, but according to the SMI  
          requirements, earn too much . . . and are therefore ineligible".

          Additionally, proponents assert that state reimbursement rates  
          for center-based child care providers "are insufficient to cover  
          a reasonable amount of the actual cost of care in high-cost  
          counties". 

          This bill leaves much of the detail of local policy to implement  
          the pilot project to the development of an "individualized  
          county child care subsidy plan."  The plan is to consider an  
          array of factors affecting the need for and delivery of child  
          care, such as demographics, income levels, local costs of care,  
          and current state policies.  The local policy must give first  
          priority to the lowest-income families.  It preserves existing  
          contracts between child care providers and SDE, but allows  
          contract amendments.  

          The bill requires the County to demonstrate a two% increase in  
          the number of days of enrollment in the first year compared to  
          enrollment in the final quarter of 2002-03 for all contracts  
          where the reimbursement rate was increased.

          This bill provides that the adopted local policy may superseded  
          state law concerning child care subsidy programs with regard to  
          eligibility criteria, fees, reimbursement rates and methods of  
          maximizing efficient use of subsidy funds.  It retains the  
          existing family fee schedule for income-eligible families but  
          allows different sliding scale fees and copayments for families  
          with incomes above the current eligibility levels.   
          Additionally, the bill protects families receiving Stage II  
          CalWORKs care and requires equal treatment of Stage III families  
          as to eligibility and fees compared to other families receiving  
          subsidized care.  

          Opponents argue that this bill too closely mirrors the  
          realignment of child care proposed by the Governor in his  
          2003-04 Budget.  They also argue that the project would take  
          child care programs outside the purview of SDE.

           
          Analysis Prepared by  :    Casey McKeever / HUM. S. / (916)  
          319-2089 








                                                                  AB 1326
                                                                  Page  5



                                                                FN: 0003829