BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    




                                                                  AB 808
                                                                  Page A
          Date of Hearing:  May 8, 2003

                    ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON UTILITIES AND COMMERCE
                                 Sarah Reyes, Chair
                  AB 808 (Canciamilla) - As Amended:  April 30, 2003
           
          SUBJECT  :  Energy: agency consolidation.

           SUMMARY  :  Establishes an Energy Agency and reorganizes the  
          state's energy regulatory framework.  Specifically,  this bill  : 

          1)Establishes the Energy Agency, with a cabinet-level Secretary  
            of Energy who is appointed by the Governor and confirmed by  
            the Senate. 

          2)Requires the Governor, by May 1, 2004, to submit for study and  
            recommendation to the Little Hoover Commission, and requires  
            the Little Hoover Commission to transmit a plan for  
            reorganization of the energy regulatory activities of the  
            state by July 1, 2004. 

          3)Requires the reorganization plan to:  

             a)   Establish within the Energy Agency all major policy  
               making functions with respect to the state's energy policy

             b)   Merge the California Consumer Power and Conservation  
               Financing Authority (Power Authority) and the California  
               Energy Commission (CEC) into the Energy Agency. 

             c)   Eliminate the Electricity Oversight Board.

             d)   Eliminate the Power Exchange.

             e)   Transfer to the Energy Agency all policy-making  
               functions pertaining to energy matters currently performed  
               by the California Public Utilities Commission (PUC) and  
               establish review mechanisms to ensure that the regulatory  
               activities of PUC are consistent with the state's energy  
               policy.

             f)   Transfer to the Energy Agency all energy conservation  
               programs and oversight currently performed by PUC.  

             g)   Establish a single board responsible for the siting of  









                                                                  AB 808
                                                                  Page B
               electrical generation and transmission facilities and  
               natural gas transmission facilities that will coordinate  
               with agencies having environmental protection  
               responsibilities.  

          4)Declares that the Energy Agency is responsible for planning,  
            developing and implementing all major aspects of the state  
            energy policy to ensure an adequate, reasonably priced supply  
            of electricity and natural gas. 

          5)Requires the secretary, in consultation with the Independent  
            System Operator (ISO), to determine appropriate reserve levels  
            needed to maintain the reliability and stability of the  
            electrical transmission and distribution grid. 

          6)Specifies that PUC will ensure that electrical corporations  
            meet the reserve levels determined to be appropriate by the  
            secretary. 

          7)Requires the Energy Agency to plan, develop and implement all  
            major aspects of the state energy policy.  The state energy  
            policy will ensure an adequate, reasonably priced supply of  
            electricity and natural gas

          8)Enacts an Energy Code containing basic structural provisions.

           EXISTING LAW  :

          1)Provides for regulation of public utilities, including gas and  
            electrical corporations, by PUC.

          2)Provides for regulation by CEC of energy conservation,  
            renewable electricity generation and siting of electric power  
            plants.  

          3)Authorizes the Power Authority to issue up to $5,000,000,000  
            of revenue bonds to augment electric generating facilities and  
            ensure a sufficient and reliable supply of electricity.

          4)Authorizes the Governor to change the structure of Executive  
            Branch agencies to, among other things, promote better  
            execution of laws, reduce expenditures, increase efficiency,  
            and eliminate duplicative efforts. 

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  Unknown.









                                                                  AB 808
                                                                  Page C

           COMMENTS  :   

          The author believes that the state's recent experiences during  
          the energy crisis brought to light a lack of accountability by  
          regulators, and also revealed considerable inter-agency  
          competition and functional duplication that has tended to  
          degrade the operations of the state's energy regulatory  
          programs.  Accordingly, the authors believe that the recent  
          energy crisis and the public focus on energy programs present a  
          unique opportunity to comprehensively reorganize the state's  
          energy agencies to achieve policy consistency, accountability,  
          efficiency and responsiveness.

           The reorganization process  

          Under existing law, the Governor may propose an executive branch  
          reorganization plan.  A reorganization plan becomes effective 60  
          days after it has been submitted to the Legislature unless  
          either the Senate or the Assembly adopts, by a majority vote, a  
          resolution rejecting the plan.  The Little Hoover Commission has  
          30 days after the plan has been submitted to the Legislature to  
          report to the Governor and the Legislature its evaluation of the  
          reorganization and any recommendations for changes.  The law  
          contemplates enactment in the following year of statutory  
          language to give effect to the reorganization, but the  
          reorganization is effective regardless of whether any follow-up  
          statutes are enacted.    



           Prior calls for energy reorganization 
           
          In 1995, Governor Pete Wilson proposed Governor's Reorganization  
          Plan No. 2 (GRP 2), an energy reorganization plan similar to  
          that which is contained in  this bill.   GRP 2 eliminated CEC and  
          the Department of Conservation, creating a new Department of  
          Energy and Conservation to perform the functions of CEC and  
          Department of Conservation.  Like  this bill , GRP 2 also set up a  
          separate Energy Facilities Siting Board to handle power plant  














                                                                  AB 808
                                                                  Page D
          review and permitting that is now performed by CEC.<1>

          Last year, this Committee heard AB 2062 (Pescetti), which also  
          proposed to create an Energy Agency.  The bill was held in  
          Committee for further review.  That measure was somewhat more  
          ambitious, in that it was intended to vest with the Department  
          of Energy all regulatory powers and jurisdiction of PUC relating  
          to energy.   This bill  continues PUC jurisdiction and regulatory  
          power over electric and gas corporations.

          This Committee last year also heard and passed AB 2383 (Diaz),  
          which directed the Little Hoover Commission to study the  
          consolidation of existing energy-related agencies into a  
          cabinet-level department.  AB 2383 was held in the Senate Energy  
          and Telecommunications Committee.

          In its analysis of the 2002-03 Budget, the LAO's Perspectives  
          and Issues feature examined whether California should  
          re-organize its energy-related activities.  LAO noted that the  
          state has a number of different state departments, boards, and  
          commissions involved in implementing, overseeing, and managing  
          the state's various energy-related policies and  
          responsibilities.  This multiplicity of agencies, and evidence  
          of certain duplicative activities and other problems, suggests  
          that it is time for the state to assess how its various  
          energy-related entities are organized and interacting with one  
          another.  Given the number of these organizational changes and  
          the speed with which they have occurred, it is not surprising  
          that a number of potentially unnecessary duplications and  
          overlaps have come to light, according to LAO's report.

          In a report issued earlier this year on the causes and policy  
          options presented by the California energy crisis, the Public  
          Policy Institute of California (PPI) observed that the  
          electricity sector restructuring, followed by an energy crisis,  
          has led to an ad hoc and confusing mix of state agencies and  
          departments.  PPI observed that the existing structure of energy  
          policymaking institutions is an impediment to attaining the  
          basic goals of the electricity sector.  PPI noted that state  
          energy policy has lost its coherence because the interrelated  
          facets of energy policy are addressed in so many separate  
          ---------------------------
          <1> GRP 2 was defeated in the Senate on July 20, 1995 by  
          adoption of SR 30 (Alquist), which resolved that the Senate did  
          not favor the plan.   









                                                                  AB 808
                                                                  Page E
          forums.  PPI suggested that a cabinet-level post be created in  
          order to coordinate policy and functions now that the worst of  
          the energy crisis has passed.

           Opposition  

          The California Municipal Utilities Association (CMUA) opposes  
          this effort at this time in the belief that it is not now wise  
          to rearrange the energy agencies until the state has determined  
          what the electricity market structure ought to look like.  In  
          particular, CMUA opposes a continuing role for ISO in ensuring  
          electric reliability.    

           REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :   

           Support 
           
          California Chamber of Commerce
          California Business Roundtable
          Pacific Gas & Electric

           Opposition 
           
          California Municipal Utilities Association


           Analysis Prepared by  :    Paul Donahue / U. & C. / (916) 319-2083