BILL ANALYSIS Appropriations Committee Fiscal Summary 653 (Nunez) Hearing Date: 8/16/04 Amended: 1/7/04 Consultant: Lisa Matocq Policy Vote: E, U & C 7-1 ____________________________________________________________ ___ BILL SUMMARY: AB 653 repeals the January 1, 2005 sunset date on the program that authorizes the State Public Works Board (SPWB) to issue revenue bonds, notes, and bond anticipation notes to finance cogeneration, alternative energy equipment, and conservation projects in public buildings, and broadens the spectrum of projects that are eligible for financing. Fiscal Impact (in thousands) Major Provisions 2004-05 2005-06 2007-06 Fund Bond authority Unknown, potentially $6,300 in 2004-05, Bond and $12,600 annually in subsequent years DGS administration Up to $2,000 annually, should be offset Special* by long-term energy cost savings *Service Revolving Fund (SRF) STAFF COMMENTS: SUSPENSE FILE. The Energy Conservation in Public Buildings program was established in 1982, and authorized the SPWB to issue bonds to finance energy and water conservation projects in state buildings that would ultimately save the state money. It is administered by the Department of General Services (DGS). AB 1551 (Pescetti, Ch. 981, St. of 1999) extended the program until January 1, 2005 and limited the SPWB's bonding authority to $500 million. As of 8/28/03, an estimated $265 million (avg. $12.6 million annually) in revenue bonds had been issued. This bill expands the scope of program by (1) authorizing the financing of projects that combine energy efficiency measures and alternative energy equipment, and (2) requiring the SWPB, in determining whether to finance a project, to evaluate the project in its entirety and analyze the costs and financial and energy cost savings over the full life of the project (rather than the administrative requirement that a project pay for itself within 10 years). It also allows the board to consider the value added by a product warranty. These changes could result in additional types of projects, such as photovoltaics being financed, and longer repayment periods. DGS's annual program administration costs vary depending on the number and scope of projects evaluated each year, but average about $2 million annually. This bill would continue those costs, beg. 2004-05. The projects financed by these revenue bonds must demonstrate the ability to generate suffcient annual cost energy savings to pay the debt service and related program costs. Thus, DGS's administrative costs should be recovered from bond proceeds.