BILL ANALYSIS
Appropriations Committee Fiscal Summary
653 (Nunez)
Hearing Date: 8/28/03 Amended: 8/18/03
Consultant: Lisa Matocq Policy Vote: E, U & C
7-1
____________________________________________________________
___
BILL SUMMARY: AB 653 repeals the January 1, 2005 sunset
date on the program that authorizes the State Public Works
Board (SPWB) to issue revenue bonds, notes, and bond
anticipation notes to finance cogeneration and alternative
energy equipment , and conservation projects in public
buildings, and broadens the spectrum of projects that can
be financed.
Fiscal Impact (in thousands)
Major Provisions 2003-04 2004-05
2005-06 Fund
Bond authority -- Unknown,
potentially $6,300 Bond
in
2004-05, and $12,600
annually in subsequent years
DGS administration -- Up to $2,000
annually, Special*
should be offset by
energy
cost savings
*Service Revolving Fund (SRF)
STAFF COMMENTS: SUSPENSE FILE. The Energy Conservation in
Public Buildings program was established in 1982, and
authorized the SPWB to issue bonds to finance energy and
water conservation projects in state buildings that would
ultimately save the state money. It is administered by the
Department of General Services (DGS). AB 1551 (Pescetti,
Ch. 981, St. of 1999) extended the program until January 1,
2005 and limited the SPWB's bonding authority to $500
million. To date, an estimated $265 million (avg. $12.6
million annually) in revenue bonds have been issued.
The bill expands the scope of program by (1) authorizing
the financing of projects that combine energy efficiency
measures and alternative energy equipment, and (2)
requiring the SWPB, in determining whether to finance a
project, to evaluate the project in its entirety and
analyze the costs and financial and energy cost savings
over the full life of the project (rather than the
administrative requirement that a project pay for itself
within 10 years). It also allows the board to consider the
value added by a product warranty. These changes could
result in additional types of projects, such as
photovoltaics being financed, and longer repayment periods.
DGS's annual program administration costs vary depending on
the number and scope of projects evaluated each year, but
are about $2 million annually. This bill would continue
those costs, beg. 2005-06. The projects financed by these
revenue bonds must demonstrate the ability to generate
suffcient annual cost energy savings to pay the debt
service and related program costs. Thus, DGS's
administrative costs should be recovered from bond
proceeds.