BILL ANALYSIS
Appropriations Committee Fiscal Summary
653 (Nunez)
Hearing Date: 8/18/03 Amended: 8/18/03
Consultant: Lisa Matocq Policy Vote: E, U & C
7-1
____________________________________________________________
___
BILL SUMMARY: AB 653 repeals the January 1, 2005 sunset
date on the program that authorizes the State Public Works
Board (SPWB) to issue revenue bonds, notes, and bond
anticipation notes to finance cogeneration and alternative
energy equipment , and conservation projects in public
buildings, and broadens the spectrum of projects that can
be financed.
Fiscal Impact (in thousands)
Major Provisions 2003-04 2004-05
2005-06 Fund
DGS administration -- Unknown,
potentially $2,000 Special*
annually
*Service Revolving Fund (SRF)
STAFF COMMENTS: This bill meets the criteria for referral
to the Suspense File. The Energy Conservation in Public
Buildings program was established in 1982, and authorized
the SPWB to issue bonds to finance energy and water
conservation projects in state buildings that would
ultimately save the state money. It is administered by the
Department of General Services (DGS). AB 1551 (Pescetti,
Ch. 981, St. of 1999) extended the program until January 1,
2005 and limited the SPWB's bonding authority to $500
million. To date, an estimated $265 million in revenue
bonds have been issued.
The bill expands the scope of program by (1) authorizing
the financing of projects that combine energy efficiency
measures and alternative energy equipment, and (2)
requiring the SWPB, in determining whether to finance a
project, to evaluate the project in its entirety and
analyze the costs and financial and energy cost savings
over the full life of the project (rather than the
administrative requirement that a project pay for itself
within 10 years). It also allows the board to consider the
value added by a product warranty in this evaluation.
These changes in the evaluation of projects could result in
additional types of projects, such as photovoltaics being
financed, and longer repayment periods.
DGS's annual program administration costs vary depending on
the number and scope of projects evaluated each year, but
are in the $2 million range. This bill would continue
those costs, beginning in 2005-06. Program and project
costs are financed with revenue bond proceeds that are
retired with energy cost savings resulting from the
projects. Energy efficiency and conservation projects must
save enough money in operational costs to cover the expense
of financing the project.