BILL ANALYSIS Appropriations Committee Fiscal Summary 653 (Nunez) Hearing Date: 8/18/03 Amended: 8/18/03 Consultant: Lisa Matocq Policy Vote: E, U & C 7-1 ____________________________________________________________ ___ BILL SUMMARY: AB 653 repeals the January 1, 2005 sunset date on the program that authorizes the State Public Works Board (SPWB) to issue revenue bonds, notes, and bond anticipation notes to finance cogeneration and alternative energy equipment , and conservation projects in public buildings, and broadens the spectrum of projects that can be financed. Fiscal Impact (in thousands) Major Provisions 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 Fund DGS administration -- Unknown, potentially $2,000 Special* annually *Service Revolving Fund (SRF) STAFF COMMENTS: This bill meets the criteria for referral to the Suspense File. The Energy Conservation in Public Buildings program was established in 1982, and authorized the SPWB to issue bonds to finance energy and water conservation projects in state buildings that would ultimately save the state money. It is administered by the Department of General Services (DGS). AB 1551 (Pescetti, Ch. 981, St. of 1999) extended the program until January 1, 2005 and limited the SPWB's bonding authority to $500 million. To date, an estimated $265 million in revenue bonds have been issued. The bill expands the scope of program by (1) authorizing the financing of projects that combine energy efficiency measures and alternative energy equipment, and (2) requiring the SWPB, in determining whether to finance a project, to evaluate the project in its entirety and analyze the costs and financial and energy cost savings over the full life of the project (rather than the administrative requirement that a project pay for itself within 10 years). It also allows the board to consider the value added by a product warranty in this evaluation. These changes in the evaluation of projects could result in additional types of projects, such as photovoltaics being financed, and longer repayment periods. DGS's annual program administration costs vary depending on the number and scope of projects evaluated each year, but are in the $2 million range. This bill would continue those costs, beginning in 2005-06. Program and project costs are financed with revenue bond proceeds that are retired with energy cost savings resulting from the projects. Energy efficiency and conservation projects must save enough money in operational costs to cover the expense of financing the project.