BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  AB 653
                                                                  Page  1

          ASSEMBLY THIRD READING
          AB 653 (Nunez)
          As Amended March 24, 2003
          Majority vote 

           BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONS   13-0 NATURAL RESOURCES   12-0        
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Correa, Shirley Horton,   |Ayes:|Jackson, La Malfa,        |
          |     |Aghazarian, Bermudez,     |     |Hancock Harman, Haynes,   |
          |     |Corbett, Koretz, Leno,    |     |Keene, Koretz, Laird,     |
          |     |Maldonado, Maze, Nation,  |     |Lieber, Lowenthal,        |
          |     |Vargas, Wyland, Yee       |     |Montanez, Wolk            |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           
          APPROPRIATIONS                 24-0                             
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |     |                          |     |                          |
          |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
          |     |                          |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
            SUMMARY  :  Extends the sunset date and eligibility requirements  
          for bonding authority related to a State Public Works Board  
          (PWB) "Energy Conservation in Public Buildings" program  
          (Program).  Specifically,  this bill  :  

          1)Expands the Program's eligibility to include projects that  
            combine conservation and alternative energy equipment.

          2)Requires PWB, in determining whether to issue funding, to  
            evaluate each proposed project in its entirety and analyze the  
            costs and financial and energy savings over the life of the  
            project.

          3)Extends the sunset date of the Program's bonding authority by  
            five years to January 1, 2010.

          4)Makes related definitional clarifications.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  Extends annual program administration costs of  
          about $2 million within the Department of General Services for  
          five years.  (All program and project costs are financed with  
          revenue bonds issued by the PWB that are retired with energy  
          cost savings resulting from the projects.)









                                                                  AB 653
                                                                  Page  2

           COMMENTS  :  This bill is intended to extend the life of the  
          Program by expanding its eligibility requirements and adding  
          another five years to its sunset date.  

          The original Program was created in 1982 and provided bonding  
          authority to PWB for up to $500 million to finance the cost of  
          conservation or alternative energy projects in state buildings.   
          According to the sponsor, the Planning and Conservation League,  
          the Program still has approximately $235 million available for  
          projects.  This bill would expand Program eligibility and extend  
          the sunset date so that it is easier to use the remaining  
          bonding authority for environmentally friendly projects on state  
          property.

          Without extension of the sunset date, the Department of General  
          Services (DGS) will stop approving future projects under the  
          Program this year because of "the significant lead time for  
          development and bond sales" required.

          This bill attempts to make a larger number of projects viable  
          under this Program by making two eligibility changes: "bundling"  
          of projects and expanding the scope of evaluation to the "life  
          of the project."  Under current law, any project must pay for  
          the service of its bond costs and interest, meaning that all  
          projects must be revenue positive in order to be approved.  

          However, a second administrative requirement held that projects  
          must pay for themselves within 10 years, regardless of the life  
          span or usefulness of the project.  By extending the evaluation  
          period to the full span of the project, longer-term investments  
          that pay off more slowly but are still revenue positive can be  
          approved.  Furthermore, by "bundling" generation and  
          conservation projects together, some projects like solar  
          generation (which, according to DGS, can be more difficult to  
          make cost-effective) are more likely to be approved as well.


           Analysis Prepared by  :    Hank Dempsey / B. & P. / (916) 319-3301  




                                                                FN: 0001372