BILL NUMBER: AB 442	AMENDED
	BILL TEXT

	AMENDED IN SENATE  JUNE 21, 2004
	AMENDED IN SENATE  JUNE 15, 2004
	AMENDED IN SENATE  MARCH 30, 2004
	AMENDED IN SENATE  JULY 3, 2003

INTRODUCED BY   Assembly Member  Richman  
Levine 

                        FEBRUARY 14, 2003

   An act to add Article 11 (commencing with Section 910) to Chapter
4 of Part 1 of Division 1 of the Public Utilities Code, relating to
telecommunications.



	LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST


   AB 442, as amended,  Richman   Levine  .
  Telecommunications:  regulatory streamlining.
   Under existing law, the Public Utilities Commission has regulatory
authority over public utilities, including telephone corporations.
Existing law authorizes the commission to fix just and reasonable
rates and charges. Under that authority, the commission has adopted
decisions adopting an incentive-based regulatory framework called the
New Regulatory Framework for certain telephone corporations.
   The existing Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 preempts any
state or local statute or regulation that may prohibit or have the
effect of prohibiting the ability of any entity to provide any
interstate or intrastate telecommunications service, but does not
prohibit a state from imposing on a competitively neutral basis,
requirements necessary to preserve and advance universal service,
protect the public safety and welfare, ensure the continued quality
of telecommunications services, and safeguard the rights of
consumers.  The prohibition also does not affect the authority of a
state or local government to manage the public rights-of-way or to
require fair and reasonable compensation from telecommunications
providers, on a competitively neutral and nondiscriminatory basis.
   Under existing law, the Federal Communications Commission licenses
and partially regulates providers of commercial mobile radio
service, including providers of cellular radiotelephone service,
broadband Personal Communications Services (PCS), and digital
Specialized Mobile Radio (SMR) services.  Under existing law, no
state or local government may regulate the entry of or the rates
charged by any commercial mobile radio service, but is generally not
prohibited from regulating the other terms and conditions of
commercial mobile radio service.  Where commercial mobile radio
services are a substitute for land line telephone exchange service
for a substantial portion of the telecommunications within a state,
commercial mobile radio service providers are not exempted from
requirements imposed by a state commission on all providers of
telecommunications services that are necessary to ensure the
universal availability of telecommunications services at affordable
rates.
   This bill would require the commission, by January 1, 2005, to
commence a rulemaking or quasi-legislative proceeding to develop
rules for harmonizing the regulation of the communications industry
to eliminate regulations and policies that are no longer necessary as
a result of technological advancements and competition in the
communications industry, to promote competition, to promote
investment that will improve quality of products, quality of service,
and greater choices for consumers, and to promote economic growth.
The bill would require the commission to adopt a final decision
adopting rules by January 1, 2006.  The bill would require that the
commission rely on competitive forces in the communication industry
to promote consumer choice and marketplace protection, whenever
possible.  The bill would provide that the transmission of
communications over the Internet, whether by voice, data, video
streams, or any combination thereof, does not, solely by reason of
engaging in any of those activities, make a corporation or person
providing the necessary software, hardware, transmission service, or
the transmission path, a public utility or subject those activities
to the jurisdiction of the commission. The bill would require the
commission to report to the relevant policy committees of the
Legislature on recommendations for any statutory changes necessary to
comply with, or to advance the purposes of, the bill. The bill would
require the commission to use existing resources to comply with the
provisions of the bill.
   Existing law makes any public utility and any corporation other
than a public utility that violates the Public Utilities Act, or who
fails to comply with any part of any order, decision, rule,
direction, demand, or requirement of the commission guilty of a
crime.
   The provisions of this bill would be a part of the act and would
require an order or other action of the commission to implement those
provisions. Because a violation of those provisions or a violation
of an order or other action by the commission to implement those
provisions would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated
local program by creating new crimes.
  The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local
agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the
state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that
reimbursement.
   This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this
act for a specified reason.
   Vote:  majority.  Appropriation:  no.  Fiscal committee:  yes.
State-mandated local program:  yes.


THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:


  SECTION 1.  Article 11 (commencing with Section 910) is added to
Chapter 4 of Part 1 of Division 1 of the Public Utilities Code, to
read:

      Article 11.  Communications Regulatory Streamlining

   910.  (a) The commission shall, by January 1, 2005, commence a
rulemaking or quasi-legislative proceeding to develop rules for
harmonizing the regulation of the communications industry for the
following purposes:
   (1) Eliminating regulations and policies for the communications
industry that are no longer necessary or appropriate as a result of
technological advancements and competition in the communications
industry.
   (2) Promoting competition.
   (3) Promoting investment that will improve quality of products,
quality of service, and greater choices for consumers.
   (4) Promoting economic growth.
   (b) The rules adopted by the commission shall protect existing
policies that provide for  all of  the following:
   (1) Basic service at reasonable rates.
   (2) Incentives and transfer payments to provide universal service
to low-income, disabled, rural, and high-cost customers.
   (3) Access to, or use of, the infrastructure of incumbent local
exchange carriers by competitive carriers, consistent with
requirements of federal and state law and the Federal Communications
Commission.
   912.  The commission shall rely on competitive forces in the
communications industry to promote consumer choice and to advance the
interests of consumers, whenever possible.
   913.  The transmission of communications over the Internet,
whether by voice, data, video streams, or any combination thereof,
does not, solely by reason of engaging in any of those activities,
make a corporation or person providing the necessary software,
hardware, transmission service, or the transmission path, a public
utility or subject those activities to the jurisdiction of the
commission.  Nothing in this section alters or affects state or
federal law regarding surcharges or regulatory fees on voice
communications over the Internet.
   914.  The commission shall, by January 1, 2006, issue a final
decision adopting rules consistent with this article.  The commission
shall use existing resources to comply with this article. The
commission may issue rules and orders exempting the communications
industry, including telephone corporations, from existing rules and
orders of the commission, in furtherance of this article.  The
commission shall report to the relevant policy committees of the
Legislature on recommendations for any statutory changes necessary to
comply with this article or to advance the purposes of Section 910.

  SEC. 2.  No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to
Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California Constitution because
the only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school
district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or
infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty
for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the
Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within the
meaning of Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California
Constitution.