BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                                   1
               1





             SENATE ENERGY, UTILITIES AND COMMUNICATIONS COMMITTEE
                            DEBRA BOWEN, CHAIRWOMAN
          

          SB 1823 -  Sher                                   Hearing  
          Date:  April 23, 2002                S
          As Introduced:  February 22, 2002            Non-FISCAL      
            B

                                                                       
            1
                                                                       
            8
                                                                       
            2
                                                                       
            3


                                   DESCRIPTION
           
           Existing law  requires the Power Exchange (PX) to "provide  
          an efficient competitive auction, open on a  
          nondiscriminatory basis to all suppliers, that meets the  
          loads of all exchange customers at efficient prices" and  
          authorizes the PX governing board to form technical  
          advisory committees.

           This bill  repeals those provisions.

                                    BACKGROUND
           
          AB 1890 (Brulte), Chapter 854, Statutes of 1996, required  
          the establishment of the PX as a "separately incorporated  
          public benefit, nonprofit corporation."  The purpose of the  
          PX was to provide an open, efficient public auction to meet  
          customers' electricity loads.  Pursuant to an order of the  
          California Public Utilities Commission, and subsequent  
          statute, investor-owned utilities were required to buy and  
          sell their electricity from the PX

          On December 15, 2000, the Federal Energy Regulatory  
          Commission (FERC) issued an "Order Proposing Remedies for  
          California Wholesale Electric Market."  This order  











               eliminated the mandatory PX "buy-sell" requirement and  
               terminated the PX's rate schedules as of April 30, 2001.   
               In the order, FERC stated "it is only by eliminating the  
               PX's exclusive mandatory exchange that we can assure that  
               prices in California wholesale markets will be just and  
               reasonable."

               Due to FERC's elimination of its chief purpose and the fact  
               that Pacific Gas & Electric and Southern California Edison  
               were in default on payments for energy purchases, the PX  
               terminated its trading operations on January 31, 2001.  For  
               these same reasons, as well as mounting litigation in  
               multiple venues, the PX filed for bankruptcy on March 9,  
               2001.  The PX remains in bankruptcy, and is contesting a  
               plan of reorganization put forward by a participant  
               committee comprised of generators that would allow  
               generators to take over remaining PX operations, as well as  
               its data from previous operations.  At its peak, the PX had  
               nearly 200 employees.  It now has 12.



































                                     COMMENTS
           
           PX wasn't meeting its statutory purpose.   Due to  
          circumstances beyond its control, the PX was unable to  
          carry out the purpose contemplated when it was established.  
           During the last several months of its operation, its  
          auctions were not competitive and did not yield efficient  
          prices.

          This bill is not likely to have any substantive effect on  
          the operations of the PX, such as they are.  Since the PX  
          has ceased serving its state law purpose pursuant to FERC  
          order and is in bankruptcy, repealing the statute defining  
          its purpose seems to have no effect, beyond removing  
          obsolete sections of law from the code.

                                   POSITIONS
           
           Sponsor:
           
          Author

           Support:
           
          None on file

           Oppose:
           
          None on file

          



























               Lawrence Lingbloom 
               SB 1823 Analysis
               Hearing Date:  April 23, 2002