BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  SB 1755
                                                                  Page  1

          SENATE THIRD READING
          SB 1755 (Soto)
          As Amended August 25, 2002
          Majority vote

           SENATE VOTE  :   39-0

           LOCAL GOVERNMENT    11-0        UTILITIES AND COMMERCE      15-0
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Wiggins, Salinas,         |Ayes:|Wright, Pescetti,         |
          |     |Cogdill, Correa, Daucher, |     |Calderon,                 |
          |     |Harman, La Suer,          |     |John Campbell,            |
          |     |Lowenthal, Keeley,        |     |Canciamilla, Cardenas,    |
          |     |Thomson, Vargas           |     |Diaz, Horton, Kelley,     |
          |     |                          |     |La Suer, Maddox, Nation,  |
          |     |                          |     |Papan, Reyes, Simitian    |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           
          APPROPRIATIONS      23-0                                        
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Steinberg, Bates,         |     |                          |
          |     |Alquist, Aroner,          |     |                          |
          |     |Ashburn, Cohn, Corbett,   |     |                          |
          |     |Correa,                   |     |                          |
          |     |Daucher, Diaz, Firebaugh, |     |                          |
          |     |Goldberg, Maldonado,      |     |                          |
          |     |Negrete McLeod,           |     |                          |
          |     |Robert Pacheco, Papan,    |     |                          |
          |     |Pavley, Runner, Simitian, |     |                          |
          |     |Keeley, Wiggins, Wright,  |     |                          |
          |     |Zettel                    |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           
          SUMMARY :  Authorizes municipal water districts and county water  
          districts to own and operate electric power plants whether  
          hydroelectric or otherwise.  Power generated from these plants  
          may be used for the district's own purposes.  Surplus power may  
          be sold to any public or private entity that sells electricity.   
          Specifically,  this bill  :   

          1)Authorizes municipal and county water districts to provide,  
            generate, and deliver electric power, and to construct,  
            operate, and maintain works, facilities, improvements, and  








                                                                  SB 1755
                                                                  Page  2

            property for that generation and delivery.

          2)Specifies that electricity produced by a district must first  
            be used by the water district for its own purposes, including  
            pumping operations, water treatment operations, barrier  
            intrusion operations and desalination operations.

          3)Authorizes municipal and county water districts to sell any  
            surplus energy generated that is not used for the district's  
            own purposes.

          4)Prohibits those districts from acquiring property employed in  
            the generation or delivery of electric power unless mutually  
            agreed between the district and property owner.

          5)Declares legislative intent that each retail customer that  
            departs from the electricity system served by the state's  
            investor-owned utilities (IOUs), after the date that the  
            Department of Water Resources (DWR) began purchasing  
            electricity on behalf of the insolvent utilities, should pay a  
            fair share of DWR's power contract obligations that are  
            recoverable in rates by the IOUs.

          6)Specifies what costs are outstanding obligations of DWR and  
            the IOUs in the wake of last year's electricity purchases by  
            DWR on behalf of the IOUs, and declares legislative intent  
            that there should not be any shifting of DWR costs from the  
            departing customers, in this case the water district, and  
            those who continue to be served by the IOUs.

           EXISTING LAW  authorizes:

          1)Municipal water districts to operate hydroelectric plants and  
            use the power for their own purposes or sell the power to  
            federal agencies, the state water project, local governments,  
            and private corporations which sell power at retail.

          2)County water districts to operate hydroelectric plants and use  
            the power for their own purposes or sell the power to public  
            utilities or public agencies.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  No state costs.  This bill requires the  
          reimbursement of stranded costs to the electrical corporation  
          that previously serviced the district (i.e., DWR).









                                                                  SB 1755
                                                                  Page  3

           COMMENTS  :  Municipal water districts can acquire, build, and run  
          plants that generate hydroelectric power and related facilities  
          (e.g., dams and reservoirs).  Municipal water districts can sell  
          their hydroelectric power to federal agencies, the state water  
          project, local governments, and private corporations which sell  
          electricity at retail, or they can use the power for their own  
          purposes.  Using the 1977 statute, five of the 40 municipal  
          water districts use hydropower to generate electricity.  This  
          bill broadens municipal water districts' authority by allowing  
          them to own and operate electric generation projects of any  
          type.

          County water districts can build and run plants that generate  
          hydroelectric power and transmission lines.  County water  
          districts can use the power for their own purposes, but the  
          power cannot be sold to customers except for public utilities or  
          public agencies.  County water districts cannot use their  
          eminent domain powers to acquire public utilities existing  
          hydroelectric power plants unless the owner agrees.  Although  
          the Legislature granted this power in 1981, none of the 173  
          county water districts generate hydroelectric power.  This bill  
          broadens county water districts' authority by allowing them to  
          own and operate electric generation projects of 
          any type. 

          This bill authorizes water districts to own and operate any type  
          of powerplant to serve their own needs and to sell surplus  
          electricity to other public or private entities engaged in the  
          distribution of electricity.  Supporters of this bill want to  
          use the generated electricity for energy-intensive, water supply  
          purposes such as desalinization and other water treatment  
          projects.  Because the generated electricity supplements a  
          project typical of a water district, there is a strong nexus  
          between the production of energy and the duties of a water  
          district.  

           
          Analysis Prepared by  :   Joanne Wong / L. GOV. / (916) 319-3958


                                                                FN: 0007071