BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  SB 1601
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:  June 17, 2002

                    ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON UTILITIES AND COMMERCE
                              Roderick D. Wright, Chair
                     SB 1601 (Bowen) - As Amended:  April 1, 2002

           SENATE VOTE  :  23-13
           
          SUBJECT  :  Cellular telecommunications service.

           SUMMARY  :  Requires a 30-day period to rescind cellular service  
          and equipment.  Specifically,  this bill  :

          1)Requires every cellular service provider to allow a 30-day  
            grace period to all new cellular service customers, within  
            which a customer may rescind the agreement and terminate  
            service without any cost or penalty, if the customer finds  
            that the cellular service quality is unsatisfactory. 

          2)Directs that every new cellular service agreement shall  
            provide reasonable notice of this 30-day grace period.

           EXISTING LAW  :

          1)Provides for licensure of cellular phone service providers  
            through the Federal Communications Commission.

          2)Empowers the California Public Utilities Commission (PUC) to  
            regulate telecommunications services.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  Unknown.

           COMMENTS  :

           Author's statements and purposes  

          According to the author, the goal here is to give people  
          information they need make sure they'll get what they pay for  
          when they sign a cellular service contract.  A prospective  
          cellular phone customer can't rely on the coverage maps provided  
          by the cellular carriers because they all contain disclaimers  
          that the map is not a guarantee of service availability or  
          quality.  In the absence of accurate maps, the only way for a  
          customer to know if the cellular phone meets their needs is to  
          use it for a period of time.  If a customer is required to sign  








                                                                  SB 1601
                                                                  Page  2

          a long-term contract to obtain service, that customer is  
          potentially stuck if he or she finds the service is less than  
          was advertised or promised.  The goal of this bill is to provide  
          customers with a reasonable way out of that long-term commitment  
          if the product they're buying doesn't live up to their  
          expectations or to the promises made by the carrier. 

          If cellular service coverage maps could be made more accurate  
          and if the "test drive" in the store could account for the  
          topography, underpasses, tunnels, buildings, trees, atmospheric  
          disturbances, other radio signals, and intensity of usage  
          challenges that a customer will face out on the "open road,"  
          there would be no need for a grace period because the customer  
          would be able to make an informed choice right in the store.   
          Since that isn't an option, the author believes the next best  
          solution is to allow customers to rescind their contracts if the  
          service proves to be unsatisfactory.  This bill gives customers  
          30 days to rescind the contract.

           Return / cancellation policies
           
          Some cellular carriers already provide customers with a grace  
          period during which they can choose to cancel the service  
          contract.  For example, AT&T Wireless gives customers a 30-day  
          grace period and Verizon has a 14-day great period.  Cingular  
          allows a 15-day return period on cellular equipment. 

          As written, this bill gives rise to an issue regarding who would  
          be responsible for the minutes of air time used if a customer  
          exercised the right to rescind the deal as provided for in this  
          version of this bill.  A person inclined to take unfair  
          advantage of the provisions of this bill could purchase a phone  
          and a service contract, talk for extended minutes, and return  
          the phone for a refund before the 30 day period runs.  This  
          could be repeated using a different dealer or wireless carrier.   
          The author or the committee may wish to consider an amendment  
          clarifying that a customer has a right to cancel an agreement,  
          but is nevertheless responsible to pay for air time minutes used  
          prior to cancellation. 

          Opponents to this bill object to a 30-day recission policy,  
          believing that a lesser period of time is sufficient for a  
          customer to ascertain if the phone service works.  Opponents  
          also believe any cancellation policy enacted in this bill should  
          not extend to business customers. 








                                                                  SB 1601
                                                                  Page  3


           REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :

           Support 
           
          Office of Ratepayer Advocates
           
            Opposition 
           
          Cingular Wireless
          Leap Wireless International, Inc.
          Advancing the Business of Technology
          Nextel Communications
          Sprint
          Verizon Wireless
          56 individual Cricket wireless telephone dealers 


           Analysis Prepared by :    Paul Donahue / U. & C. / (916) 319-2083