BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                       


           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                   SB 201|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 445-6614         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                                 THIRD READING


          Bill No:  SB 201
          Author:   Speier (D)
          Amended:  6/4/01
          Vote:     27

           
           SENATE ENERGY, U.&C. COMMITTEE  :  5-1, 4/24/01
          AYES:  Bowen, Alarcon, Murray, Speier, Vincent
          NOES:  Morrow

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  7-0, 5/31/01
          AYES:  Alpert, Bowen, Escutia, Karnette, Murray, Perata,  
            Speier


           SUBJECT  :    Public Utilities Commission

           SOURCE  :     Author


           DIGEST  :    This bill makes changes to the Office of  
          Ratepayer Advocate within the California Public Utilities  
          Commission, intended to enhance consumer and ratepayer  
          advocacy services.  The bill transfers $1.85 million from  
          the Public Utilities Commission Utilities Reimbursement Act  
          to the California Public Utilities Commission Ratepayer  
          Advocate Account.

           ANALYSIS  :    Current law establishes a division within the  
          California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) to represent  
          the interests of public utility customers in CPUC  
          proceedings.  The director of the division, known as the  
          Office of Ratepayer Advocate (ORA), serves at the pleasure  
          of the Governor and is subject to confirmation by the  
                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                SB 201
                                                                Page  
          2

          Senate.  The Governor's ability to appoint the ORA director  
          and the specific Ratepayer Advocate Account in the State  
          General Fund are scheduled to sunset on January 1, 2002.

          Current law provides that should the sunset take place, the  
          law would return to the way it read prior to 1997, whereby  
          the CPUC appointed and funded the ORA to represent the  
          interests of utility customers and subscribers in CPUC  
          proceedings.

          This bill removes the sunset, requires the ORA director to  
          be paid a salary equal to 90 percent of that received by  
          the CPUC commissioners (an increase of probably less than  
          $2,000 annually), and deletes the replacement section of  
          law that would take effect should the sunset actually take  
          place.

          The bill provides that the ORA shall represent the  
          interests of public utility customers and subscribers, but  
          no longer limits that representation to commission  
          proceedings.

          The bill transfers $1.85 million from the CPUC Utilities  
          Reimbursement Account to the CPUC Ratepayer Advocate  
          Account in 2001-02 and appropriates that amount for the  
          bill's purposes.

           Background  

          ORA is the state-sanctioned representative of consumers at  
          the CPUC and it's required to participate in all  
          significant electric, telecommunications, natural gas, and  
          water cases.  In the smallest cases, ORA may provide the  
          only financial analysis of the case, but in larger cases,  
          ORA frequently presents the only comprehensive alternative  
          analysis to the one put forth by the utility.

          In 1996, concurrent with the electric restructuring effort,  
          the existing ORA was modified to make its director a  
          Governor's appointment and to provide a separate line item  
          within the CPUC budget.  The purpose of this change was to  
          ensure ORA accountability.  Without this bill, those  
          provisions will sunset, meaning ORA will be returned to its  
          former status and make its director an appointee of the  







                                                                SB 201
                                                                Page  
          3

          CPUC.

          Many other consumer groups are represented at the CPUC.  In  
          order to encourage participation, state law provides for  
          compensation of costs if that group makes a substantial  
          contribution to the case and participation by that group  
          couldn't occur without significant financial hardship, as  
          determined by the CPUC.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  Yes   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    
          Local:  No

                          Fiscal Impact (in thousands)
           
          Major Provisions      2001-02     2002-03     2003-04     Fund  

          Enhanced ratepayer            $1,850*   $3,700     
          $3,700Special*
          Advocacy            Increased costs are potentially offset
                              By increased fee revenues

          *Transfers $1.85 million from the URA to the RAA.

          Existing law also requires that moneys from the URA be  
          transferred in the annual budget act to the RAA to cover  
          the costs of the program.  The URA receives about $60  
          million annually from fee revenues.  The funds may be used  
          for specified purposes including the PUC's budget.  The  
          Governor's budget includes $13.4 million for the ORA.  The  
          increased costs are estimated at $3.7 million annually.   
          This shift could result in decreased funding for other PUC  
          operations, or increased fees to cover the costs associated  
          with enhanced advocacy.       


          NC:kb  6/4/01   Senate Floor Analyses 

                       SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  NONE RECEIVED

                                ****  END  ****