BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  AB 1724
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:  April 23, 2001

                       ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES
                                 Howard Wayne, Chair
                  AB 1724 (Pavley) - As Introduced:  March 19, 2001
           
          SUBJECT  :  Public utilities:  Reliable Electric Service  
          Investments Act.

           SUMMARY  :  This bill deletes an existing sunset on local  
          government eligibility to receive customer credits for  
          purchasing renewable energy that is not under contract with a  
          utility.

           EXISTING LAW  :

          1)Generally requires State Energy Resources Conservation and  
            Development Commission (CEC) to perform duties relating to the  
            conservation and development of energy resources under the  
            Warren-Alquist State Energy Resources Conservation and  
            Development Act (Public Resources Code section 25000 et seq.)

          2)Provides customer credits to anyone who purchases renewable  
            energy not under contract with a utility.

          3)Sunsets the customer credit to public entities on January 1,  
            2002.

           THIS BILL :  Deletes the sunset on customer credits to public  
          entities for the purchase of renewable energy that is not under  
          contract with a utility.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  Unknown.

           COMMENTS  : 

          According to the author's office, AB 1890 (Brulte), Chapter 854,  
          Statutes of 1996 provided $540 million from ratepayers  
          (including local governments) to encourage investment and  
          competition in a renewable energy market during the transition  
          years from 1998 to 2001.  The funds were placed in the Renewable  
          Resource Trust to be administered by the CEC.  Last year, AB 995  
          (Wright), Chapter 1050, Statutes of 2000 and SB 1194 (Sher),  
          Chapter 1050, Statutes of 2000, among other things, extended the  
          collection of funds by the three investor owned utilities for  








                                                                  AB 1724
                                                                  Page  2

          the Renewable Resource Trust for an additional 10 years in five  
          year blocks.  

          Among the various allocations of the funds are customer credits  
          for the purchase of renewable energy that is not under contract  
          with a utility.  The customer's total credit is based on how  
          much electricity was consumed in a one-year period (up to 10  
          cents per kilowatt hour with a $1000 cap per electric meter) and  
          could be incorporated either into the electricity price paid to  
          the provider or itemized separately.  Under existing law, that  
          credit is available through the CEC for both private and public  
          entities that wish to purchase renewable energy.  However, AB  
          995 and SB 1194 sunset the eligibility of public entities for  
          the customer credit on January 1, 2002.  

          According to supporters of the bill, because public agencies  
          regularly pay for the customer credit, they deserve access to  
          its benefits.  In addition, they believe that the sunset on the  
          eligibility prejudices local governments' ability to receive the  
          incentive.

          An example of a community using renewable energy is the City of  
          Santa Monica.  The City of Santa Monica has committed to  
          purchasing 100% of its power for municipal purposes from  
          suppliers of renewable energy.  Under the existing program at  
          the CEC, the city had received approximately $200,000 in  
          reduced-price rates per year to partially offset the higher  
          costs of renewable electricity. 

           REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :   

           Support 
           
          City of Berkeley
          City of Santa Monica

           Opposition 
           
          None on file
           

          Analysis Prepared by  :  Kyra Emanuels Ross / NAT. RES. / (916)  
          319-2092