BILL ANALYSIS 1
1
SENATE ENERGY, UTILITIES AND COMMUNICATIONS COMMITTEE
DEBRA BOWEN, CHAIRWOMAN
AB 1233 - Pescetti Hearing Date:
August 29, 2001 A
As Amended: August 27, 2001 FISCAL B
1
2
3
3
DESCRIPTION
Under existing law , gas utilities are authorized to charge rates for
all reasonable and prudent costs associated with ownership and
operation of natural gas transmission facilities.
This bill:
1.Requires the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) to
investigate impediments to the in-state production and storage of
natural gas as part of a gas utility's rate proceeding.
2.Prohibits the CPUC from adopting rates that discourage in-state
production or storage of natural gas.
3.Authorizes the CPUC adopt rates to encourage in-state production
or storage of natural gas, including, but not limited to, reducing
local transmission rates applicable to in-state gas blends, unless
it finds that such action will likely result in consequences
adverse to the interests of gas customers.
BACKGROUND
California imports approximately 85% of its natural gas supply,
primarily from gas fields in the southwest and Alberta, Canada. The
15% of supply derived from in-state sources is typically a lower
quality gas, which burns less efficiently (low-BTU gas). Low-BTU
gas must be blended with higher efficiency gas, such as propane, to
meet pipeline and end use specifications. Additional supplies of
in-state, low-BTU gas are available, but remain untapped.
The terms of Pacific Gas and Electric's (PG&E) gas utility
operations are defined by the Gas Accord, a comprehensive settlement
approved by the CPUC in 1997. The Gas Accord establishes the rates
and terms and conditions of service on PG&E's gas transmission
system through December 31, 2002. Pursuant to the Gas Accord, local
gas transmission rates are paid by all end users.
According to the author, current local gas transmission rates
provide disincentives to the storage and blending of natural gas, as
well as the construction of pipelines by non-utility entities. The
author states that gas stored off-line before moving back to the
utility's transmission system is charged a local transmission rate,
then charged again when the gas is delivered to the end user. The
author says these additional charges can make it uneconomical for
generators of electricity or the entities that supply their gas to
employ the blending process needed to make low-BTU gas usable.
COMMENTS
Round Two. The prior version of this bill was heard by this
committee July 10. The prior version provided an exemption from
local gas transmission rates for in-state gas blends delivered to
certain non-core customers. At the July 10 hearing, the author
agreed to amend the bill to provide broader policy guidance to
remove disincentives to in-state production and storage of natural
gas. As amended, the bill is intended to provide such guidance to
the CPUC without being overly prescriptive.
ASSEMBLY VOTES
Assembly Floor (75-0)
Assembly Appropriations Committee (12-0)
Assembly Utilities and Commerce Committee
(15-0)
POSITIONS
Sponsor:
Author
Support:
California Independent Petroleum Association
California Manufacturers & Technology Association
California Municipal Utilities Association
Calpine
Sacramento Municipal Utility District
Oppose:
Pacific Gas and Electric Company
Sempra Energy
Lawrence Lingbloom
AB 1233 Analysis
Hearing Date: August 29, 2001