BILL ANALYSIS
AB 468
Page 1
Date of Hearing: May 2, 2001
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Carole Migden, Chairwoman
AB 468 (Cohn) - As Amended: April 16, 2001
Policy Committee:
TransportationVote:18-0 (Consent)
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program:
No Reimbursable:
SUMMARY
This bill codifies safeguards currently practiced at the DMV
against identity theft in the process of obtaining duplicate
driver's licenses and identification cards. Specifically, this
bill:
1)Requires the DMV to be furnished with satisfactory proof of
the identity of the person requesting the duplicate license or
ID card, including a document containing a photograph of the
person.
2)Allows the DMV to verify the person's identity by inspecting
its own photographic files from the person's prior license or
ID card if the person is unable to provide the above proof of
identity.
FISCAL EFFECT
Minor absorbable costs to the DMV to inspect its photographic
files for a larger number of transactions. (State Highway
Account.)
COMMENTS
1)Rationale . The author argues that the procedure by which a
duplicate driver's license or ID card can be issued by the DMV
to persons who have purportedly lost, destroyed or mutilated
their license or card has become one of the primary means by
which identity theft occurs in California. The identity thief
applies for a duplicate license or card in the name of the
unsuspecting holder of the license or card. If granted, the
AB 468
Page 2
thief can then establish credit, write checks, apply for jobs,
or partake in any number of activities in the name of the
victim. While the DMV has recently responded by tightening up
proof of identity requirements, this bill codifies those
improvements.
2)Prior Legislation . AB 2382 (Leach) of 2000 would have
required the DMV to check its photographic files for every
request for a duplicate license or ID card. AB 2382 was held
on this committee's Suspense file.
Analysis Prepared by : Steve Archibald / APPR. / (916)
319-2081