BILL ANALYSIS
AB 117
Page 1
Date of Hearing: May 9, 2001
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Carole Migden, Chairwoman
AB 117 (Migden) - As Introduced: January 22, 2001
Policy Committee: B&P Vote:12-0
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program:
No Reimbursable:
SUMMARY
This bill requires that 1% of annual General Fund revenues be
used, upon appropriation in the annual Budget Act, for the
acquisition, construction, rehabilitation, modernization, or
renovation of infrastructure that is owned by the state.
FISCAL EFFECT
If this measure was in effect for the 2001-02 budget, about $790
million would be set aside for state infrastructure. Assuming
average annual growth in General Fund revenues of 5 percent,
after 10 years, the amount earmarked for infrastructure would
total about $1.2 billion.
COMMENTS
1)Background . Chapter 606, Statutes of 1999 (AB 1473,
Hertzberg) requires the governor to annually submit a
statewide five-year capital outlay plan to the Legislature.
The plan must include identification of infrastructure
requested by state agencies and K-12 education and propose a
plan to finance the identified needs. In addition, the
Legislative Analyst's Office December 1998 report,
"Overhauling the State's Infrastructure Planning and Financing
Process", discussed several reasons for the state's
underinvestment in infrastructure, including the lack of a
stable funding source, and the over-reliance on bond funding
and limited use of pay-as-you-go funding.
The author states that AB 117 provides a means to increase
pay-as-you-go funding for infrastructure by setting aside one
percent of General Fund revenues each year for acquisition and
AB 117
Page 2
improvement of state facilities subject to appropriation by
the Legislature in the annual budget act. The author believes
that this proposal "will provide assurance that the state can
at least address the highest priority needs" identified in the
five-year capital outlay plan. The author maintains that the
state should primarily use this ongoing source of
pay-as-you-go funding to improve infrastructure for which the
state has direct responsibility, thus the bill limits
eligibility for funding from the account to state-owned
infrastructure.
2)Prior Legislation . Last year, AB 2099 (Migden), which was
substantially similar to this bill, was held on the Senate
Appropriations Committee's Suspense file. AB 2020 (Leach),
which incrementally increased a General Fund set-aside to 5%
for state and local infrastructure, was held on this
committee's Suspense file last year.
3)Related Legislation . AB 1020 (Leach), which is similar to AB
2020, is in the Assembly Local Government Committee.
Analysis Prepared by : Chuck Nicol / APPR. / (916)319-2081