BILL ANALYSIS
AB 60 X1
Page 1
Date of Hearing: March 21, 2001
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Carole Migden, Chairwoman
AB 60 X1 (Hertzberg) - As Amended: March 19, 2001
Policy Committee: E.C.&A.Vote:17-0
Urgency: Yes State Mandated Local Program:
No Reimbursable:
SUMMARY
Requires that the California Energy Commission (CEC), as a
condition of powerplant certification, require the applicant to
offer to sell the plant's electricity-to an investor-owned
utility, a municipal utility, or the Department of Water
Resources-at contract terms at least as favorable as those
offered to another entity. (This requirement would apply to any
applications pending with the CEC on the effective date of this
measure.)
FISCAL EFFECT
Minor absorbable costs to the CEC to adopt rules and regulations
to implement and enforce the bill's requirements.
COMMENTS
1)Purpose . This bill is intended to promote native generation
of electric power in California at the best available rates.
On some days as much as 15 percent of California's generating
capacity leaves the state in search of higher prices on the
western states' interconnected grid. However, 25 percent of
California's generating capacity comes from out of state
generation. A "me-first" mindset is beginning to gain
momentum in other western states, and given that California is
a net importer of electricity, it may not be in the state's
best long-term interest to be too parochial with generation
supply.
This bill attempts to balance the need to add new generation
capacity into California's purchasing mix without discouraging
new powerplant applications by binding the sale of new
AB 60 X1
Page 2
capacity within California at lower rates than those available
from other parties. Essentially this bill seeks to encourage
new generators to sell to California electrical corporations,
munis or the DWR, but in a manner consistent with market-based
pricing that does not reserve all generating capacity on a de
facto basis for California sources.
2)Opposition . The Independent Energy Producers indicate the
bill would essentially require an applicant to execute a
contract for power sales as a condition to obtaining a permit.
The IEP objects to a requirement upfront "before the project
has proven itself to be operational and during a period where
market conditions will undoubtably change."
Analysis Prepared by : Chuck Nicol / APPR. / (916)319-2081