BILL ANALYSIS AB 60 X1 Page 1 Date of Hearing: March 21, 2001 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS Carole Migden, Chairwoman AB 60 X1 (Hertzberg) - As Amended: March 19, 2001 Policy Committee: E.C.&A.Vote:17-0 Urgency: Yes State Mandated Local Program: No Reimbursable: SUMMARY Requires that the California Energy Commission (CEC), as a condition of powerplant certification, require the applicant to offer to sell the plant's electricity-to an investor-owned utility, a municipal utility, or the Department of Water Resources-at contract terms at least as favorable as those offered to another entity. (This requirement would apply to any applications pending with the CEC on the effective date of this measure.) FISCAL EFFECT Minor absorbable costs to the CEC to adopt rules and regulations to implement and enforce the bill's requirements. COMMENTS 1)Purpose . This bill is intended to promote native generation of electric power in California at the best available rates. On some days as much as 15 percent of California's generating capacity leaves the state in search of higher prices on the western states' interconnected grid. However, 25 percent of California's generating capacity comes from out of state generation. A "me-first" mindset is beginning to gain momentum in other western states, and given that California is a net importer of electricity, it may not be in the state's best long-term interest to be too parochial with generation supply. This bill attempts to balance the need to add new generation capacity into California's purchasing mix without discouraging new powerplant applications by binding the sale of new AB 60 X1 Page 2 capacity within California at lower rates than those available from other parties. Essentially this bill seeks to encourage new generators to sell to California electrical corporations, munis or the DWR, but in a manner consistent with market-based pricing that does not reserve all generating capacity on a de facto basis for California sources. 2)Opposition . The Independent Energy Producers indicate the bill would essentially require an applicant to execute a contract for power sales as a condition to obtaining a permit. The IEP objects to a requirement upfront "before the project has proven itself to be operational and during a period where market conditions will undoubtably change." Analysis Prepared by : Chuck Nicol / APPR. / (916)319-2081