BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                       


           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                   AJR 1X|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 445-6614         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                                 THIRD READING


          Bill No:  AJR 1X
          Author:   Cardoza (D), et al
          Amended:  4/25/01 in Senate
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE ENERGY, U.&C. COMMITTEE  :  6-0, 5/1/01
          AYES:  Bowen, Alarcon, Dunn, Murray, Sher, Speier

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  48-7, 4/19/01 - See last page for vote


           SUBJECT  :    Natural gas

           SOURCE  :     Author


           DIGEST  :    This resolution urges the President, Congress  
          and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to take  
          certain actions to address the high cost of natural gas.

           ANALYSIS  :    California imports approximately 85% of its  
          natural gas supply.  More than half of imported supplies  
          are transported from gas fields in the Southwest via  
          pipelines controlled by El Paso Natural Gas Company (El  
          Paso Pipeline).

          California has been paying a premium for natural gas.  The  
          "basis" is the difference between the price of gas where it  
          is produced and the price at its destination.  The basis is  
          typically equal to the additional cost of transportation,  
          however, in California, the basis has significantly  
          exceeded actual transportation costs.  According to this  
          resolution, border gas prices reached $62/mmbtu in December  
                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                AJR 1X
                                                                Page  
          2

          2000, while actual production and transportation costs were  
          about $5.50.  Recently, border gas prices have ranged  
          between $10 and $15/mmbtu, still significantly higher than  
          other regions.  Prices at the Southern California border  
          are typically higher than prices at the Northern California  
          border.

          The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) has  
          attributed the large basis to the exercise of market power  
          by El Paso Pipeline and its affiliate, El Paso Merchant  
          Energy.  A significant block of El Paso Pipeline's firm  
          capacity is controlled by El Paso Merchant, a gas and  
          electricity marketer.  The CPUC contends that El Paso  
          Merchant has artificially limited gas supplies by  
          withholding available pipeline capacity, thus raising  
          prices for gas.  High spot gas prices also support high  
          electricity prices, particular given FERC's approach to  
          enforcing just and reasonable rates for electricity, where  
          all sellers may legally charge a theoretical proxy price  
          based on border gas prices regardless of their actual  
          costs.

          Last year, the CPUC filed a complaint against El Paso at  
          FERC, charging that El Paso has exercised market power to  
          increase gas prices at the California border.  FERC has yet  
          to take significant action on the CPUC complaint.  It has  
          recently issued some procedural rulings, but hasn't  
          addressed the merits of the case.  Without naming El Paso,  
          this resolution appears to be intended to seek federal  
          action on these issues.

          This resolution urges the President, Congress and the  
          Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to take certain  
          actions to address the high cost of natural gas.

          Specifically, this resolution:

          1.Makes general findings regarding the high cost of natural  
            gas, the negative impact this cost has on California, and  
            the history of natural gas regulation.

          2.Makes specific findings regarding FERC's regulation of  
            the interstate transportation of natural gas and  
            excessive rates charged by wholesalers transporting  







                                                                AJR 1X
                                                                Page  
          3

            natural gas to California.

          3.Urges the reestablishment of cost-based regulation for  
            natural gas sales at the California border and the  
            prohibition of pipeline capacity withholding.

          4.Urges the Chairman of FERC to place the issue of  
            cost-based natural gas regulation on the FERC agenda and  
            allow it to be voted on.

          5.Urges the President to meet with a bi-partisan delegation  
            of California legislators to discuss the energy crisis.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Fiscal Com.:  No

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :
          AYES:  Alquist, Aroner, Calderon, Canciamilla, Cardenas,  
            Cardoza, Chan, Chavez, Cohn, Corbett, Correa, Diaz,  
            Dutra, Firebaugh, Florez, Frommer, Goldberg, Havice,  
            Horton, Jackson, Keeley, Kehoe, Koretz, Liu, Longville,  
            Lowenthal, Matthews, Migden, Nakano, Nation, Negrete  
            McLeod, Oropeza, Papan, Pavley, Reyes, Salinas, Shelley,  
            Simitian, Steinberg, Strom-Martin, Thomson, Vargas,  
            Washington, Wayne, Wesson, Wiggins, Wright, Hertzberg
          NOES:  Aanestad, Ashburn, Bill Campbell, John Campbell,  
            Hollingsworth, Leonard, Wyman


          NC:sl  5/2/01   Senate Floor Analyses 

                       SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  NONE RECEIVED

                                ****  END  ****