BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  AB 1
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   April 23, 2001

                    ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON UTILITIES AND COMMERCE
                              Roderick D. Wright, Chair
                    AB 1 (Aanestad) - As Amended:  April 16, 2001
           
          SUBJECT  :  Electrical restructuring:  energy.

           SUMMARY  :  This bill requires the California Public Utilities  
          Commission (CPUC) to establish a single, universal rebate rate  
          for all energy efficiency technologies used for large  
          nonresidential standard performance contract programs allocated  
          funds under the rate component. 

           EXISTING LAW  requires electrical corporations to identify a  
          separate rate component to collect a system benefits charge to  
          fund energy efficiency, renewable energy, and research,  
          development and demonstration programs.  

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  Unknown.

           COMMENTS  :  Among the many programs initiated and supported under  
          the system benefits charge contained in Section 399.8 of the  
          Public Utilities Code, are energy efficiency programs. At  
          specified funding levels.  This bill would establish a single  
          rebate rate to pay to large nonresidential customers under  
          performance contract programs for energy efficiency technologies  
          used by these customers.

          This measure provides a specific, additional incentive for the  
          largest users of electricity, and the group most likely to  
          benefit from the overall demand reduction efforts in the state  
          by implementing energy efficiency technologies.  The rebate rate  
          would be standardized across this customer class and provide  
          financial incentive for investment in energy efficient  
          technologies in a uniform manner.  The specifics of what the  
          rebate rate should be and how they should be paid out to  
          customers of investor owned utilities (IOUs) , specifically,  
          Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E), San Diego Gas and Electric  
          (SDG&E) and Southern California Edison (SCE) would be left to  
          CPUC to determine.  This measure ensures that all large  
          nonresidential customers receive the same incentive and rebate  
          for investment in energy efficient technologies and simplifies  
          the process under which rebates are implemented for this  
          customer class. 








                                                                  AB 1
                                                                  Page  2


           Who Gets What and Why?
            
           Under AB 1, large nonresidential customers would continue to be  
          subject to oversight of CPUC as to which programs will be  
          administered and what types of benefits will accrue for energy  
          efficiency program.  This measure requires that one of the  
          benefits be administered through a uniform rebate for all  
          customers within this class.  The measure does not stream off  
          any specified funds from current disbursements and earmark them  
          for the rebates, it leaves that sort of latitude with CPUC.  It  
          is certainly true to infer that this measure takes away  
          flexibility from IOUs in how they provide rebates or other  
          incentives directly to customers in this class from the system  
          benefits program.  However, there is fairness in uniformity and  
          there is institutional knowledge at CPUC which is retained to  
          determine how much of the benefits program funds should be set  
          aside for these uniform rebates.  This measure seems to specify  
          a single, equitable delivery mechanism for one type of benefit  
          to be paid to large nonresidential customers of IOUs under the  
          existing program without eliminating or altering any other  
          existing delivery mechanisms.
           
          Staff Recommends:

           This bill provides an equitable mechanism for encouraging use of  
          energy efficient technologies by large nonresidential customers  
          subject to performance contract programs.  The author may wish  
          to clarify that the establishment of the single rebate rate for  
          this class of customers is meant to be net of energy efficiency  
          allocations across all customers classes, however, to clarify  
          that funds paid by all classes of customers into the system  
          benefits program continues to be spread across all classes of  
          customers. 

           REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :   

           Support 
           
          None on file.

           Opposition 
           
          PG&E
           








                                                                 AB 1
                                                                  Page  3


          Analysis Prepared by  :    Kelly Boyd / U. & C. / (916) 319-2083